Consider an optimization model with a number of resource constraints. Each indicates that the amount of the resource used cannot exceed the amount available. Why is the shadow price of such a resource constraint always zero when the amount used in the optimal solution is less than the amount available?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Shadow pricing refers to the practice of accounting the prince of securities not on their assigned market value (as might be expected) but by their amortized costs. This can also be considered an "artificial" price assigned to a non-priced asset or accounting entry.

In this optimization model, we find a number of resource constraints which limit the changes to the resources. It is expected that these resources would not exceed the amount allocated for each particular constraint. The shadow price of a resource constraint would be zero in this example because the amount used would be less than the amount available. This means that it can fit within the established parameters, and therefore, would not need to be assigned a shadow price.

Related Questions

$500 shared in ratio 2:3:9
What is the sum of the polynomials?(8x^2 - 9y^2 - 4x) + (x^2 - 3y^2 - 7x) * 7x^2 - 6y^2 + 3x * 9x^2 - 6y^2 + 3x * 9x^2 - 12y^2 + 3x * 9x^2 - 12y^2 - 11x
What is 3 divided by 9,473
What is the factored form of 27d^6 + 8g^12
19 + 11 - 12² ÷ 3 (12 - 9) · 11)) - 7 =Use PEMDAS for this.Also it's a made up question

How to write an equivalent expression for n times a using only addition

Answers

Maybe an answer would be 30=20+n What is the value of the variable?

What is 3.14 times 10

Answers

31.4. If you can give brainliest that would be cool, otherwise it’s okay.

31.4 when multiplying by 10 you can just move the decimal point over:)

The parabola y=x2 is scaled vertically by a factor of 7. What if the equation of the new parabola

Answers

Answer:

$f(x) = x^2$

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

$g(x) = k f(x)$

And then function would be:

$g(x) = 7x^2$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the original function given by:

$f(x) = x^2$

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

$g(x) = k f(x)$

And then function would be:

$g(x) = 7x^2$

Ashley has two coupons for a phone.Coupon A:
Coupon B:
65% off of a $65 phone
$45 rebate on a $65 phone
Choose the coupon that gives the lower price.
Then fill in the blank with the correct value.

Answers

I think it’s Coupon A because the price should be 42.25 or about 42 dollars

Algebra 2. pls help:(

Answers

the correct answer is C

The correct one is C because you want to add the imaginary numbers together to simplify the equation. 6i+5/2i=17/2i. Then you add that to your real number. 17/2i+2/3

Which if the following quartic functions has x = 1 and x =

Answers

Answer:

y = x⁴ +4x³ +4x² +4x +3

Step-by-step explanation:

The coefficients of the offered quartics (in order) have 1, 1, 1, and 0 sign changes, respectively. Descartes' rule of signs tells you this means the first three choices all have one (1) positive real root, so the negative real roots -1 and -3 are not the only ones.

The only possible polynomial is the last one. Synthetic division of that polynomial by roots -1 and -3 leave the remaining factor as x²+1, which has only complex zeros.

The appropriate choice is ...

... y = x⁴ +4x³ +4x² +4x +3

Other Questions

A decision maker is considering including two additional variables into a regression model that has as the dependent variable, Total Sales. The first additional variable is the region of the country (North, South, East, or West) in which the company is located. The second variable is the type of business (Manufacturing, Financial, Information Services, or Other). Given this, how many additional variables will be incorporated into the model?a. 9b. 8c. 6d. 2

What is the median of 6, 7, 10, 12, 15? 12 10 9.6

Help please! I’ll give brainliest!

Solve for 6(2+2) explain answer with reasoning