First-person: gives a personal feeling as the narrator shares his or her thoughts.
Second person: the reader feels like he or she is being addressed by the writer.
Third-person: the reader can learn about several characters' thoughts.
It elevates the conflict and tension by reinforcing the narrator's view of the natives and limits readers' understanding of the natives and their actions.
First-person narratives also have a much easier time garnering empathy from your audience, since they end up spending so much time in your character's brain. If done well, it can give logic and motivations to characters that would seem otherwise evil, immoral, or otherwise not relatable.
Learn more about first-person point of view here: brainly.com/question/1999125
#SPJ2
Points of view in narration provide various benefits in storytelling: first-person creates intimacy, third-person limited offers a narrowed perspective, and second-person involves the reader directly.
The student's question is about matching each point of view with its benefit in storytelling. First-person narration, using pronouns like "I" and "we," gives a story a personal feeling as the narrator shares their thoughts and feelings, providing an intimate perspective. In contrast, third-person limited narration uses pronouns like "he," "she," and "they," focusing on one character's point of view, which can show the world through their eyes but might present a biased story. Finally, second-person narration directly addresses the reader with 'you,' drawing them into the story as a character and creating a sense of involvement.
A. do evacuating B. postpone evacuating C. evacuating storm D. evacuating area
After analyzing the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams in "The Crucible," we can say the following about his hesitation:
Proctor hesitates to reveal the truth about Abigail because they used to have an affair. He is afraid of being accused of adultery and having his wife taken away from him.
Abigail Williams accuses John Proctor of practicing witchcraft, which leads to his incarceration. Proctor knows the truth behind Abigail's actions, and he knows she has been lying about everything related to the witchcraft incident.
However, he does not come forward to expose her as a fraud. The reason for that is their past relationship. The two used to have an affair, which is also considered a grave offense. Afraid of being accused of adultery, Proctor remains silent. All he can do is insist on saying he is innocent.
Learn more about "The Crucible" here:
John Proctor's hesitation to reveal Abigail as a fraud stems from potential damage to his reputation, fear of retribution from the Puritan society, and the doubt of his truth being accepted amidst the town's hysteria.
The question pertains to the character of John Proctor in Arthur Miller's play 'The Crucible'. Proctor's conflict about revealing Abigail Williams as a fraud stems from several concerns. The first is his personal one, as he knows that admitting Abigail is a fraud would also mean revealing his affair with her, thus risking damage to his reputation. Furthermore, in the strict Puritan society of Salem, where false accusations could lead to serious consequences, John is also worried about facing potential retribution from the rest of the community. Lastly, he doubts whether his word would be accepted over Abigail's, knowing the mass hysteria that has gripped the town.
#SPJ3