Answer:Enchoring effect
Explanation:The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which we tend to depend on the first offered information as an anchor to make. This anchor first Information is what we will use as a reference to make subsequent decisions or judgements.
Mary is counting on that fact , that people will hear about a person who got a 10 year sentence and will use that information as an anchor to make judgements about their own criminal actions.
-reproducing the existing class structure.
-punishing those who deviate from mainstream American values.
-teaching the values and ideals that we need to function in society today.
-making inner-city schools extraordinarily unhappy places.
Answer:
-punishing those who deviate from mainstream American values.
Explanation:
Randall Collins is a very influential American sociologist today. His works have been translated into several languages and his thoughts regarding political and economic changes, social conflicts, micro-sociology and others are followed by many people across the planet.
Collins has a strong opinion about the educational system that we have today, for him this system is weak, unresponsive and has no responsibility and commitment to those who go through it. He believes that currently the education established in the country, informs that it will form citizens ready for the job market that will evaluate their technical and intellectual capacities, however, the educational system ends up indoctrinating people with the standards of cultural respectability that it believes is essential for the society. As a result, this system ends up punishing those who deviate from the main American values, to a lower quality life through precarious jobs.
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the "exclusionary rule."
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. If evidence is gathered through an illegal search, it is typically considered "fruit of the poisonous tree" and is excluded from court proceedings, as it is tainted by the initial illegality.
This rule is intended to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches and to protect individuals' constitutional rights. The exclusionary rule is a crucial element of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, upholding the integrity of the legal system.
Know more about exclusionary rule here
#SPJ12
Answer:
BASED ON THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
Explanation:
All the cost sums up to $4,000 when there is no extra charge. In this case, the opportunity cost is the same with the total cost. In this case Mikael is willing to forgo $4,000 for this opportunity and it makes his opportunity cost. However, since the transportation expenses become $1,200 instead of $1,000. We don't know exactly he buys this ticket or not, but since it is said that "while he was booking", we have to consider that he buys the ticket. The hotel costs $1,500 and it cannot be redeemed. However, $2,700 is a sunk cost, not an opportunity cost. Because in this case, Mikael does not have any alternative. He gave up from his decision in the end.
The cost of opportunity in this scenario is Mikael decision to the forgo seeing Ouro Preto during his stay in the Brazil.
Cost of Opportunity is refers to the decision making process people use in the terms of how they spend their times, money or resources. This term was refers to the loss that a person suffer by picking a certain options. In this case, does't want Mikael to cut his foods budget. Instead, he pick to skip visiting Ouro Preto. So this represents how the Mikael is losing out on seeing this site in order to eat the food he wants while on the vacation.
All the cost of the sum up to the $4,000 when there are no extra charge. On this case, opportunity cost is the same as the total cost. In this case, Mikael is willing to the forgo $4,000 for this opportunity and it make his opportunity cost. So, since the transportation expenses become $1,200 rather than of $1,000. We don't know to exactly if he buy this ticket or not, but since it is said that "while he was booking", we have to consider that he buys ticket. The hotel costs $1,500 and it cannot be redeemed. However, $2,700 is the sunk the cost, not an opportunity cost. Because in this case, Mikael does not have any alternative. He gave up on his decision in the end.
Learn more about opportunitycosts here brainly.com/question/12121515
#SPJ2
Answer:
the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand in Sarajevo.
Explanation:
sample answer
Answer:
In times of reduced visibility or at night, a non-powered canoe or kayak should display an all-around white light.
Explanation:
the answer is 42 (from hithhikers guide to the galaxy)