Answer:
Increase price.
Explanation:
Price elasticity is the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price. Ideally as price increases quantity demanded reduces. When prices reduce quantity demanded increases.
As a new manager of Rock Record company, if the economics consultants inform you the price elasticity is less than one it means quantity does not change with increase in price.
So price can be increased without a corresponding decrease in price. The goal of higher revenue can be achieved by increasing the product price.
Answer:
The correct answer is: increase prices.
Explanation:
Price elasticity refers to the changes in quantity demand after the change in price for a good or service. Elasticity is calculated by dividing the percentage in quantity demanded by the percentage change in price. If the result is equal or greater than one (1) the demand is elastic. If the result is lower than 1 the demand is inelastic.
Thus, in the case given, Rock Record Company has an inelastic price demand since it is lower than 1. It implies changes in price are unlikely to change the quantity demanded. As the company needs to increase the revenue, the easiest method to achieve that is to raise the product prices.
Answer:
the income is $1,330
Explanation:
The computation of the income is shown below;
Given that
U(x, y) = min{x, y2}
Price of x is $25
ANd, the prcie of Y is $15
So,
25X + 15Y = M
if Y = 7,
So,
At eqm, X = Y^2 = 49
Then ,
M = 25 × 49 + 15 × 7
= 1225 + 105
= 1330
Hence, the income is $1,330
The same should be relevant and considered too
For utility maximization, Elmer's income should be $1330, considering his consumption of 7 units of y at $15 each and a maximum of 49 units of x at $25 each.
To find Elmer's income for utility maximization, we need to consider his utility function, the prices of the goods (x and y), and the quantity of y he chooses to consume.
Elmer's utility function is U(x, y) = min{x, y^2}, which means his utility depends on the minimum of x and y^2. In this case, he chooses to consume 7 units of y at a price of $15 each, so his expenditure on y is 7 * $15 = $105.
Now, we need to find out how much he is willing to spend on x to maximize his utility. Since the utility function takes the minimum of x and y^2, we want to make x as small as possible to keep utility high. Let's assume he consumes x units of x.
For utility maximization, x must be the minimum between x and y^2. In this case, x <= y^2, so x <= 7^2 = 49.
Now, we need to find the price of x, which is $25 per unit.
To maximize utility, he should spend his remaining income on x, so his income (I) should satisfy:
I = expenditure on x + expenditure on y
I = (x * $25) + ($105)
We know that x <= 49, so let's assume he consumes the maximum possible x, which is 49. Therefore,
I = (49 * $25) + ($105)
I = $1225 + $105
I = $1330
So, Elmer's income for utility maximization should be $1330.
For more such questions on utility
#SPJ3
Complete question below :
If Elmer's utility function is U(x, y) = min{x, y^2}, and he chooses to consume 7 units of y at a price of $15 each, what must his income be for utility maximization?
Answer:
$2 million or $2,000,000
Explanation:
The computation of the revenue and gross profit or loss will appear in the company’s income statement in the first year is shown below:
= revenue recognized - cost incurred
The Total cost is
= $6 + $9
= $15
And, the revenue recognized is
= $6 ÷ $15 × $20
= $8
So, the gross profit is
= $8 - $6
= $2
hence, the gross profit is $2 million
Answer:
C = 1.75Q + 4,990
variable 1.75
fixed component 4,990
Explanation:
High-Low method:
we subtract the highest level of activity with the lowest one:
24,398 units generates 42,696 cost
with this information we can solve for variable cost.
42,696 / 24,398 = 1.75
Now we calcualte the fixed cost:
TC = variable x Q + fixed cost
82,620 = 1.75 (44,360) + fixed cost
82,620 - 77630 = 4990
the formula will be:
C = 1.75Q + 4,990
Answer: variable 1.75
fixed component 4,990
Explanation: subtract the highest level of activity from the lowest one
44,360-19,962=24,398
82,620-39,924=42,696
then do 42,696 / 24,398 = 1.75
Now for fixed cost:
82,620 = 1.75 (44,360)
82,620 - 77630 = 4990
Answer:
a) Assets: Reserves $200,000; Liabilities: Deposits $200,000
b) Amount Deposited: $2000,000; Change in Excess Reserves: $190,000; and Change in Required Reserves: $10,000
c) See the calculation below and the attached excel file for the table.
d) the $200,000 injection into the money supply results in an overall increase of $4,000,000 in demand deposits.
Explanation:
These can be answered as follows:
a) Complete the following table to reflect any changes in First Main Street Bank's T-account (before the bank makes any new loans).
Note: See the attached excel file for the table.
The $200,000 deposited by Lorenzo to First Main Street Bank led to the creation of both an asset and a liability for First Main Street Bank.
As a result, the reserve of the bank is increased by $200,000 on the asset side of the T-account. It is therefore now possible for the ban to grant loan to other customers from these additional reserves.
In addition, the demand deposit of the bank is increased by $200,000 on the liability side of the T-account. This is recorded as a demand deposit because it is possible for Lorenzo to come at any time to the band to withdraw his deposit either by using a debit card or by writing a check.
b) Complete the following table to show the effect of a new deposit on excess and required reserves when the required reserve ratio is 5%. Hint: If the change is negative, be sure to enter the value as negative number.
Note: See the attached excel file for the table. Just scroll the excel file down to part b.
The required reserve ratio of 5% indicates that First Main Street Bank has to hold 5% of the $200,000 the deposit or fresh fresh reserves, and this will result in having a 95% excess reserve which the bank can employ to grant loans.
From the amount deposited, the change in excess reserve and the change in the required reserve can be computed as follows:
Amount deposited = $200,000
Change in excess reserve = $200,000 * (1 - 5%) = $190,000
Change in required reserve = $200,000 * 5% = $10,000
c) Now, suppose First Main Street Bank loans out all of its new excess reserves to Juanita, who immediately uses the funds to write a check to Gilberto. Gilberto deposits the funds immediately into his checking account at Second Republic Bank. Then Second Republic Bank lends out all of its new excess reserves to Lorenzo, who writes a check to Neha, who deposits the money into her account at Third Fidelity Bank. Third Fidelity lends out all of its new excess reserves to Teresa as well.Fill in the following table to show the effect of this ongoing chain of events at each bank. Enter each answer to the nearest dollar.
Note: See the attached excel file for the table. Just scroll the excel file down to part c.
As already computed in part b above, we have the following to show the effect of this ongoing chain of events at each bank, we have:
For First Main Street Bank:
Increase deposit = Deposit from Lorenzo = $200,000
increase in required reserve = $200,000 * 5% = $10,000
Increase in loans = Loan to Juanita = $200,000 * (1 - 5%) = $190,000
For Second Republic Bank:
Increase deposit = Deposit from Gilberto = $190,000
Increase in required reserve = $190,000 * 5% = $9,500
Increase in Loans = Loans to Lorenzo = $190,000 * (1 - 5%) = $180,500
For Third Fidelity Bank:
Increase deposit = Deposit from Neha = $180,500
Increase in required reserve = $180,500 * 5% = $9,025
Increase in Loans = Loans to Teresa = $180,500 * (1 - 5%) = $171,475
d) Assume this process continues, with each successive loan deposited into a checking account and no banks keeping any excess reserves. Under these assumptions, the $200,000 injection into the money supply results in an overall increase of in demand deposits.
In order to calculate this, the formula for the money multiplier is used to multiply the initial deposit or injection of $200,000 by Lorenzo as follows:
Money multiplier = 1/r
Where r denotes required reserve ratio of 5%, or 0.05.
Therefore, we have:
Overall increase in demand deposits = Injection * (1 / r) = $200,000 * (1 / 0.05) = $200,000 * 20 = $4,000,000
Therefore, the $200,000 injection into the money supply results in an overall increase of $4,000,000 in demand deposits.
When the Federal Reserve buys a government bond from a client of First Main Street Bank, the bank's assets increase by the bond value and its liabilities increase by the same amount in deposits.
In this scenario, when the Federal Reserve buys a $200,000 government bond from Lorenzo, a client of First Main Street Bank, and he deposits the money into his checking account at the bank, there are changes in the bank's T-account. The bank's assets increase by $200,000 in reserves, while its liabilities increase by $200,000 in deposits.
Next, if First Main Street Bank loans out all of its new excess reserves to Juanita, who writes a check to Gilberto, Gilberto deposits the funds into his checking account at Second Republic Bank. This process continues with each successive loan deposited into a checking account at each bank. The increase in deposits, required reserves, and loans at each bank can be filled in the table provided.
Assuming this process continues with no banks keeping any excess reserves, the $200,000 injection into the money supply results in an overall increase of $200,000 in demand deposits.
#SPJ3
Answer:Mary wins because Melissa failed to object to the merchant's confirmation memorandum.
Explanation:
A contract is first establish based on offer and acceptance between two parties. The telephone conversation of Mellisa to Mary constitute a valid offer and the email communication of Mary constitute a valid acceptance.
Furthermore the time interval between the email communication and delivery of the goods are enough period for Mellisa to counter the acceptance memorandum of Mary which she failed to carry out. This is the reason Mary wins.
Answer:
≈ 9644 quantity of card
Explanation:
given data:
n = 4 regions/areas
mean demand = 2300
standard deviation = 200
cost of card (c) = $0.5
selling price (p) = $3.75
salvage value of card ( v ) = $ 0
The optimal production quantity for the card can be calculated using this formula below
= u + z (0.8667 ) * б
= 9200 + 1.110926 * 400
≈ 9644 quantity of card
First we have to find u
u = n * mean demand
= 4 * 2300 = 9200
next we find the value of Z
Z = ( )
= ( 3.75 - 0.5 ) / 3.75 = 0.8667
Z( 0.8667 ) = 1.110926 ( using excel formula : NORMSINV (0.8667 )
next we find б
б = 200 = 400