The exchange rate for converting the druba to the troon is1 troon = 1.5 druba.
The amount in dollar that is obtained as the exchange rate in between two different currencies refers to the par value. This par value of currency depends on the exchange rates. Say for an instance, one British pound has the value of three U.S dollars and if an individual has 100 pounds, then $300 will be the par value in dollars.
The currency devaluations up to 10 percentage were allowed under the Bretton Woods system. This can also be done only getting approvals form the International Monetary Funds. When considering gold, the total amount of currency that is essential in purchasing one ounce of gold is known as gold par value. The exchange rate for converting the druba to the troon is 1 troon = 1.5 druba.
Should be sold at the split-off point, rather than processed further.
Would increase the company's overall net income by $45,000 if processed further and then sold.
Would increase the company's overall net income by $108,000 if processed further and then sold.
Would increase the company's overall net income by $9,000 if processed further and then sold.
Answer: Would increase the company's overall net income by $9,000 if processed further and then sold.
Explanation:
The Revenue if sold at the split-off point is $63,000.
But if processed further, we can realize revenue of,
= $108,000 - 36,000
= $72,000
To find out the revenue difference then we will subtract the alternatives.
= $72,000 - 63,000
= $9,000
$9,000 extra will be gained if we process further as opposed to selling at the Split-off point. This shows that Option D or the last option is correct.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": interest payments that vary by the yield to maturity each year.
Explanation:
Bonds are investments in the form of loans that companies provide. The firm pays investors a coupon yield, which is the annual or semiannual interest paid on the principal of the bond purchased. The payments continue until the bond reaches its maturity or the amount of the principal is completely paid off.
Answer:
$192,880
Explanation:
We need to determine the balances for each of the items.
Work in process =(5,000/225,000*100) × 8,000
= 2.2% × 8,000
= 176
Finished goods = (20,000/225,000 *100) × 8,000
= 8.9% × 8,000
= 712
Cost of goods sold = (200,000/225,000 *100) × 8,000
= 88.9% × 8,000
= 7,120
Therefore, the revised ending balance for COGS would be ;
= 200,000 - 7,120
= $192,880
c. marginal.
d. switching.
Answer:
d. switching.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that Mountain university used IBM computers also the apple computers offered them a better machiner at a lesser cost but the university did not buyed as the switching cost is too high
Bcz from exchanging from IBM computer to Apple computers the cost is high and that cost we called as switching
Hence, the correct option is d.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash A/c Dr $3,700
To Treasury Stock A/c $3,500
To Additional Paid in Capital A/c $200
(Being the reissued shares are recorded)
The computation is shown below:
For cash account:
= 100 shares × $37 per share
= $3,700
For Treasury Stock Account
= 100 shares × $35 per share
= $3,500
And, for Additional Paid in Capital Account
= $3,700 - $3,500
= $200
For reissued shares, we debited the cash account and credited the treasury stock and Additional Paid-in Capital account
monetize and count
express corporate responsibility
Using the perspective of a business owner of a mid-size manufacturer, select the approach/approaches you would recommend for this company (mid-size manufacturer). Support the selection by explaining the approach, describing which of the five (5) environmental positions you espouse, and how the approach and positions relate to key ethical theories we have studied?
1. The environment shouldn’t be protected.
2. The environment should be protected in the name of serving human welfare.
3. The environment should be protected in the name of serving future generations’ welfare.
4. The environment should be protected in the name of serving animal welfare.
5. The environment should be protected for its own sake.
Answer:
To answer the above question , the closest and which includes all human, animal and realted welfare is
"The environment should be protected in the name of serving future generations’ welfare".
Explanation : when it comes to buisness, ethics and moral with code of conduct the ultimate reason behind this is to make the better world to serve future generation with all such discipline and carry forward the same positive approach towards all human, animal and other welfare's.
By this above option/approach is different and consider a cumulative welfare for better world to serve future generation.
Coming to other option/approach is only specific to certain groups only and it does'nt through light on other's welfare.
To add more , "when you focus on one group of welfare success will be there but if you focus and prioritize together with better competency and required area success path is wide and opened"
So saving and serving the environment to future generation is high valued and required. By this we can able to match the ethical, moral and social responsibality.