Answer: A. Expressing rage over the terrible plight of drug addicts to demonstrate her intense commitment to change
Explanation: What will certainly not increase credibility with the audience is expressing rage. While it may seem that expressing rage and anger is good for showing commitment to a problem, a desire for change, and that Amy cares about reducing the suffering of drug addicts, rage shows that there is a lack of composure with Amy, and composure is key when one wants to gain credibility, because anger can point to certain shortcomings of anyone who wants credibility at all costs.
On the other hand, showing keen interests and enthusiasm for problem solving indicates dynamism, while quoting adequate sources to confirm claims and fluent speaking are elements of competence, that is, someone who has the competence to solve a problem.
As of now, the government is doing an enough job to ensure that human rights are being protected through providing basic human rights such as food, water, and shelter. Though this is the case, we cannot deny the fact that there should be progress in terms of the different possibilities that the government may offer in order to address the current problems available right now. These human rights are being addressed, but of course, there should always be progress.
b. punctuation.
c. regulative rules.
d. constitutive rules.
e. ambiguity.
The husband and wife's different interpretations and responses to each other's communication behaviors contribute to the breakdown in their relationship.
The difference between how the husband and wife see their communication behaviors is due to differences in punctuation, regulative rules, and constitutive rules.
Punctuation refers to how people interpret the sequence of events or behaviors in a relationship. Regulative rules are guidelines for interpreting and responding to communication behaviors, while constitutive rules are the shared understandings of how to interpret and perform certain actions or behaviors.
In this case, the husband perceives his wife's nagging as the cause of his withdrawal, while the wife perceives her husband's withdrawal as the reason she nags. Their different interpretations and responses to each other's behaviors contribute to the communication breakdown.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Man in the middle attack(MITM)
Explanation:
This a term popular with hackers in computer and cybersecurity fields. The man in the middle attack describes a situation whereby there is an in-between in the perceived private conversation of two persons online. The middle man acts like an intermediary between these two, eavesdropping on each others conversation and controlling it while making it look as though they are having a private cyber conversation.
Presupposition is the answer
Answer:
Presupposition
Explanation: