Answer:
It is better to buy an energy efficient model for $ 1700.
Explanation:
It is better to buy an energy efficient model for $ 1700 because at the end of five years its costs will be less than $ 1500. It saves $ 45 each year and that would save $ 45*5 = $ 225 at the end of five years. That would result in low costs as $ 1700- $ 225= $ 1475 which is less than $ 1500.
Buying $1500 is not a smart choice because then it would add up to expenses . Expenses for $ 45 each year would result in $225 in five years that would add up to be $ 1725 which is higher than $ 1700.
Answer:
In a closed economy, public saving is the amount of
d. tax revenue that the government has left after paying for its spending.
Explanation:
Public saving or budget surplus in a closed economy describes the excess of government revenue (obtained through taxation of individuals and businesses in the economy) and government expenditures on goods and services. In an open economy, transfers are deducted before arriving at the public saving. In all economies, the addition of private (individual and business) and public savings result to national investments.
Answer: The Economic order quantity(EOQ) is 74 boxes.
Explanation:
Given weekly demand (d)= 4 boxes
Annual demand (D) = 452 = 208 boxes
Ordering cost S = $5
Holding cost H = $0.347
Standard deviation () = 0.50
Lead time (L) = 2 weeks
∴ Economic order quantity (EOQ) Q is as follow :
Q =
Q =
Q = 77.42 or 74
The Economic order quantity(EOQ) is 74 boxes.
Answer:
The quarter has 3 months so all 15 weeks shall have following taxes:
Employee Wages Exempt under FUTA or SUTA
Employee 1
Wages = 15 week x 900 = 13.500
Exempt under FUTA or SUTA = 13,500 - 7,000 = 6.500
Employee 2
Wages = 15 week x 1200 = 18.000
Exempt under FUTA or SUTA = 18.000 - 7,000= 11000
From the above table.
The JM pays employee 1: 900 and employee 2: 1,200. For 15 weeks they were paid,
Employee I is paid, 900 x 15 weeks
= 13,500
Employee 2 is paid, 1200 x 15 weeks
= I 8,000
For employee 1,
= 13,500 - 7,000
Here, SUTA tax is 5.4% on the first 7,000 the employer pays an employee = 6500
For employee 2,
=18,000 - 7000
Here, the SUTA tax is 5.4% on the first 7000 the employer pays an employee =11000
The taxable wages are obtained by deducting.
= (13,500 +18000) - (6,500 +11,000)
= 31500 - 17500
= 14000
The SUTA and FUTA taxes that JM pays at the end of quarter 1 and 2 is, SUTA,
0.057 x 14,000 = $798
FUTA.
0.008 x 14000
= $112
Hence. The SUTA and FUTA taxes paid are $798 and $112 respectively.
Jean Michaud will pay a state unemployment tax of $1,556.10 and a federal unemployment tax of $163.80 per quarter for his two employees.
The question pertains to calculating the unemployment taxes that Jean Michaud will have to pay for his two employees at a state rate of 5.7% and federal rate of 0.6%. Firstly, we calculate the total wages paid to both employees per quarter. One quarter comprises 13 weeks, therefore the total wages paid per quarter would be ($900+$1200) * 13 = $27,300.
Next, we calculate the unemployment taxes. The state unemployment tax would be $27,300 * 5.7% = $1,556.10 and the federal unemployment tax would be $27,300 * 0.6% = $163.80.
Therefore, the state and federal unemployment taxes Jean will pay at the end of quarters 1 and 2 are respectively $1,556.10 and $163.80. Note, these calculations assume that these are the only two employees and their wages are constant throughout these quarters.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Function
Explanation:
Functional departmentalisation is when staff who perform similar functions are put in the same department.
Examples of functional departmentalisation includes- marketing department, production department, finance department, human resources department.
Advantages of functional departmentalisation include:
1. It makes coordination of activities easier
2. It enhances supervision of staff
3. It enhances specialisation.
Functional departmentalisation can lead to overspecialisation and the inability of managers to perform in other departments other than their primary departments.
Other types of departmentalisation are :
1. Customer departmentalisation
2. Geographic departmentalisation
3. Process departmentalisation
4. Product departmentalisation
Answer:
Please see attachment
Explanation:
Please see attachment
b. $360,000.
c. $72,000.
d. $48,000.
Answer:
b. $360,000.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Purchase value of the patent = $720,000
At the time of purchase, the patent life is 15 years
And, the useful life of the patent is 10 years
So, the amortization expense recorded value is
= $720,000 ÷ 10 years × 5 years
= $360,000
The five years is counted from the year 2006 to the year 2011