Answer:
Spain has a proportional advantage in the production of cheese since it has to provide up only 5 barrels of beer for making one pound of cheese, although, Switzerland has to provide up 10 barrels of beer which is higher. Switzerland has a proportional advantage in the construction of beer since it has to give up 1/10th pound of cheese, although, Spain has to provide up 1/5th pound of cheese which is higher.
The price must be higher than the opportunity cost of the retailer and less than the prospect cost of the consumer. The terms of trade should lie among the prospect cost of the buyer and seller to be favorable to both.
More than 5 barrels.
More than 1/10th pound of cheese.
A and C.
Spain has a comparative advantage in cheese production and Switzerland in beer production. Spain gains from trade when it receives more than 5 barrels of beer per pound of cheese it exports, and Switzerland when it gets more than 1/10 pound of cheese per barrel of beer. From this, option A (6 barrels per pound) and C (7 barrels per pound) are both beneficial trade prices for both countries.
When we compare the opportunity cost of producing cheese in Spain and Switzerland, we can see that Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese, and Switzerland in the production of beer. This is because Spain can produce cheese at a lower opportunity cost than Switzerland.
Regarding trade, Spain will gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than 5 barrels of beer for each pound of cheese it exports to Switzerland. For Switzerland, it will gain from trade as long as it receives more than 1/10 pound of cheese for each barrel of beer it exports to Spain.
Considering the above, the prices of trade that would allow both countries to gain from trade would be A. 6 barrels of beer per pound of cheese and C. 7 barrels of beer per pound of cheese. These prices are above the opportunity cost of cheese in Spain and below the opportunity cost of cheese in Switzerland, satisfying the needs of both parties.
#SPJ3
Illegal multilevel marketing gimmick that promises commissions on one's own sales as well as on the sales of recruits called Pyramid scheme.
A pyramid scam is an unethical and unreliable investment pitch that depends on guaranteeing irrational profits on fictitious investments. The fact that the early investors receive these substantial returns prompts them to endorse the program to others. Returns to investors are paid from fresh capital coming in. When there are no more investors left, the pyramid eventually falls.
These businesses, sometimes known as pyramid schemes, are prohibited in the United States.
What is multi level Marketing?
Distributors profit from the sale of tangible goods and from commissions on the purchases and sales of the distributors they have recruited through Multi-Level Marketing operations (MLMs), which are respectable business schemes.
Although they sometimes pass for MLMs, pyramid schemes are more concerned with the fees from recruiters than the money from product sales.
To know more about Pyramid Schemes, refer to-
#SPJ4
2. Prepare the necessary journal entries. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field. Enter your answers in millions (i.e., 10,000,000 should be entered as 10).)
1. Record compensation expense on December 31, 2016.
2. Record any tax effect related to compensation expense recorded in 2016.
3. Record compensation expense on December 31, 2017.
4. Record any tax effect related to compensation expense recorded in 2017.
5. Record the exercise of the options on March 20, 2021 when the market price is $12 per share.
6. Record any tax effect related to the exercise of the options.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Determine the total compensation cost pertaining to the stock option plan:-
Estimated fair value per option $2
X Option granted 40 million
Total compensation $ 80 million
Answer:
The dividend of $147,420 is allocated to preferred stockholders
A dividend of $38,580 is allocated common stockholders
Explanation:
The preferred stock has a fixed amount of dividend which is a percentage of its par value computed thus:
preferred dividend=13,000*$81*14%=$ 147,420.00
However, when preferred stock dividend is taken away from the total dividends, the result is dividends for common stockholders
Common stockholders' dividends=$186,000-$147,420=$38,580.00
Answer:
A. more information should be gathered before deciding on which project, if either, is desirable.
Explanation:
The lower Payback Period is not sufficient information to decide which project is more profitable. The payback period indicates when in the life of a project the initial investment principal cash flow is achieved.
But to decide about a certain project it is better to know the interest yield, it is also important to get the life of the project and other information.
For example:
a.- 250 investment 100 per year payback in 2.5-year life 3 years
b.- 500 investment 100 per year payback in 5-year life 20 years
While A payback occurs before project B is better
Lansing Company’s 2017 income statement and selected balance sheet data (for current assets and current liabilities) at December 31, 2016 and 2017, follow.
LANSING COMPANY
Income Statement
For Year Ended December 31, 2017
Sales revenue $ 118,200
Expenses
Cost of goods sold 49,000
Depreciation expense 15,500
Salaries expense 25,000
Rent expense 9,700
Insurance expense 4,500
Interest expense 4,300
Utilities expense 3,500
Net income $ 6,700
LANSING COMPANY
Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
At December 31 2017 2016
Accounts receivable $ 6,300 $ 7,200
Inventory 2,680 1,890
Accounts payable 5,100 6,000
Salaries payable 1,020 770
Utilities payable 360 230
Prepaid insurance 330 420
Prepaid rent 360 250
Problem 16-1A Indirect: Computing cash flows from operations LO P2
Required:
Prepare the cash flows from operating activities section only of the company’s 2017 statement of cash flows using the indirect method. (Amounts to be deducted should be indicated with a minus sign.)
LANSING COMPANY
Cash Flows from Operating Activities—Indirect Method
For Year Ended December 31, 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of the Cash Flows from Operating Activities—Indirect Method is shown below:
Cash flow from Operating activities - Indirect method
Net income $6,700
Adjustment made:
Add : Depreciation expense $15,500
Add: Decrease in accounts receivable $900 ($6,300 - $7,200)
Less: Increase in inventory -$790 ($2,680 - $1,890)
Less: Decrease in accounts payable -$900 ($5,100 - $6,000
Add: Increase in salaries payable $250 ($1,020 - $770)
Add: Increase in utility payable $130 ($360 - $230)
Less: Decrease in prepaid insurance -$90 ($330 - $420
Add: Increase in prepaid rent $110 ($360 - $250)
Total of Adjustments $15,110
Net Cash flow from Operating activities $21,810
Answer: preparing financial statements
& prepare papers for external auditor
Explanation:
Since Felicia worked for a retail company, there are definitely two things she would have being doing for the retail company that would be similar in the rod she wants to apply for at the insurance industry, they are;
-preparing financial statements;
-prepare papers for external auditor
these are a roles she would have definitely played at one point or the other for the retail store and are vital when working for the insurance industry