Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Supreme Court made provisions that allow any party who is not very satisfied with a decision he or she got from the high court in any civil case to appeal to the court of appeal.
The court stipulates the Notice of Appeal in form 112, which must be filled within thirty-days from the time of the judgment or order they hope to appeal against. The appellant has to provide security for the respondent at the time of filling this appeal in form 112.
Anti-communist legislators in the United States during the Cold War era viewed Hollywood as a major concern due to their perception of the entertainment industry as a potentially powerful tool for spreading communist propaganda.
They believed that Hollywood actors, directors, and writers were sympathetic to the communist cause and could use their influence to sway public opinion in favor of communism. This fear was exacerbated by the fact that many Hollywood figures were politically active and outspoken, particularly during the 1930s and 1940s when leftist politics were more popular. In response to these concerns, anti-communist legislators launched investigations into Hollywood in the late 1940s and early 1950s, seeking to root out supposed communist sympathizers and expose any subversive activities taking place within the industry. These investigations, which included the notorious House Un-American Activities Committee hearings, resulted in the blacklisting of many prominent Hollywood figures and had a chilling effect on the entertainment industry for many years.
Learn more about communist from here:
#SPJ11
Answer:
its simple, we kill the batman
Explanation:
Answer:
Amid all the uncertainty about the world that will follow the pandemic, one thing is almost sure to be true: tensions between the United States and China will be even sharper than they were before the coronavirus outbreak. The resurgence of U.S.-Chinese competition poses a host of challenges for policymakers—related to trade and economics, technology, global influence, and more—but none is more consequential than reducing the risk of war. Unfortunately, thanks to today’s uniquely dangerous mix of growing Chinese assertiveness and military strength and eroding U.S. deterrence, that risk is higher than it has been for decades, and it is growing.
Neither Washington nor Beijing seeks a military conflict with the other. Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump both undoubtedly understand that a war would be disastrous. Yet the United States and China could all too easily stumble into conflict,
Explanation:
I dont Understand?
The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States was Sonia Sotomayor. Born on June 25, 1954, in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has Puerto Rican heritage.
She had a distinguished legal career before her appointment to the Supreme Court, serving as a federal district judge and then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she was confirmed by the Senate in August 2009. Sotomayor's appointment marked a historic moment, as she became the first Hispanic and third woman to serve on the nation's highest court.
Learn more about Sonia Sotomayor:
#SPJ12
Sonia Sotomayor was the first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama.
The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Sonia Sotomayor. She was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed in 2009. She was nominated in 2009 by President Obama. Born to Puerto Rican parents in the Bronx, New York, Sotomayor has a long career in law, including serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court. The first Hispanic to serve on the Supreme Court was Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
#SPJ12
The given statement "Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror" is true.
Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror before it has been accepted by the offeree. It is important to note that an offer can only be revoked before it has been accepted. Once an offer has been accepted, it becomes a binding contract and can no longer be revoked.
There are a few exceptions to the rule that an offer can only be revoked before it has been accepted. For example, an offer can be revoked if it is made under duress or if there is a mutual mistake of fact. Additionally, an offer can be revoked if it is made to a specific person and that person dies or becomes incapacitated.
Revocation of an offer can be done verbally or in writing. However, it is important to note that the revocation must be communicated to the offeree in order to be effective. If the revocation is not communicated to the offeree, the offer remains valid and can be accepted.
For such more question on Revocation
#SPJ6
Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror in contract law.
In contract law, revocation refers to the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror before it is accepted by the offeree. It is important to note that revocation can generally occur any time before acceptance, unless the offer includes an option contract or the offeror has made a firm promise to keep the offer open for a certain period.
For example, if a person offers to sell their car to another person and later changes their mind, they can revoke the offer as long as the other person has not accepted the offer yet.
#SPJ6
Yes, this statement is true in this regard.
Explanation:
Article III of the United States constitution deals with the judicial power which explains that the whole judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court is the higher authority for the legal solutions. This article also express that the congress can establish the other inferior or lower level court from time to time.
Although the constitution creates Supreme Court but it gives power to the Congress to decide the functioning and organization of the Supreme Court. In the Judiciary Act of 1789, the congress used this power under this act the congress created a supreme court with 6 judges and also created a lower federal court.
Answer:
True
Article III (3)