Answer:
Please refer the detail answer in the memo below
Explanation:
Date: 24 January 20XX
Subject: Review of Impairment of Goodwill
From: External Auditors
To: Chief Accountant, Plush Corporation
Upon review of the investment made by your company in Common Corporation, we believe that there are possible indications of the impairment of the goodwill initially recognized in the books upon acquisition.
At the time of Acquisition:
Consideration = $450,000
Fair Value of Net Assets = $430,000
Goodwill = $450,000 - $430,000 = $20,000
The new guidance issued by FASB, requires only a one-step quantitative impairment test, whereby a goodwill impairment loss will be measured as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value.
However, if we follow the previous guidance of FASB, we have to test the impairment with the following three steps:
Step 1: We will compare the carrying amount of the net assets with the Fair value of Reporting Unit, and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, we will record the impairment.
Step 1: We will compute, implied value of goodwill by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with the fair value of the identifiable net assets, if FV of net assets are higher, then there is no impairment, otherwise we will jump to Step 3.
Step 3: If the calculated implied value of the goodwill is lower than the actual goodwill at acquisition, than the difference is the impairment loss, however in case the implied value of the goodwill is higher than the actual goodwill at acquisition, no impairment shall be recorded.
Apparently, since the fair value of Common had increased to $485,000, there is no need to recognize the impairment loss on goodwill; however we believe that the estimated fair value of Common is less than the $430,000 and therefore impairment should be recorded.
Answer:
a. advocate redistributing income from David to Rita.
Explanation:
Since David is getting a lower utility from his last dollar obtained (6) than Rita (10), the benefit that David gains from this last dollar is less than what Rita would gain if she was the one receiving this dollar. Therefore, those who favor an equal distribution of income would advocate redistributing income from David to Rita, since total utility would increase with this redistribution.
Answer:
The explanation including its single issue is outlined in the section below on theories.
Explanation:
Analysis of work environment or profession is also widely recognized as the analysis of jobs. That would be the first starting point throughout the staffing process.
It describes items as follows:
and stored at various warehouses facilities. The coordinated efforts with each
channel partner at each touch point takes efficiency and communication. In
order for the process to run smoothly, which three functions do channel
partners need to perform to efficiently flow products and titles to the
consumer to get payments back to producers?
O transactional, logistical, and facilitating functions
o facilitating, commercial, and institutional functions
logistical, commercial, and transactional functions
Answer:
transactional, logistical, and facilitating functions
Explanation:
Suppose that Italy and Austria consider trading shoes and fish with each other. Italy can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than _______ of fish for each pair of shoes it exports to Austria. Similarly, Austria can gain from trade as long as it receives more than _______ of shoes for each pound of fish it exports to Italy.
Based on your answers to the previous question, which of the following terms of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of fish) would allow both Austria and Italy to gain from trade? Check all that apply.
(A) 8 pounds of fish per pair of shoes
(B) 1 pound of fish per pair of shoes
(C) 15 pounds of fish per pair of shoes
(D) 3 pounds of fish per pair of shoes
Answer:
Section 1..... Italy has a comparative advantage in the production of shoes, and Austria has a comparative advantage in the production of fish.
Section 2.... 5 pounds of fish, ; 1/10 pairs of shoes
Section 3..... A and C.
Explanation:
The comparative advantage is known to be a term that is in use in the economic world,where a country or company has the ability of producing goods at extremely lower cost compared to that of its partners or competitors.
This is very important because, the country or company will be able to produce its goods by making use of fewer resources.
And thereby gives the country or company an edge in selling its goods at a reasonable lower price when compared with that of its competitors.
In this case, it is summarized or concluded that, Italy has a lower opportunity cost of producing shoes. So, Italy has a comparative advantage in shoes and Sweden has a comparative advantage in fish.
Answer:
It is unethical for the CFO to record the additional $75,000 without receipts and supporting documents
Explanation:
The company balance sheet needs to reflect the true financial position of the firm, hence the right thing to do is to ask for documentation and receipts before recording the additional $ 75,000.
Answer:
10 fewer tons of pollution into the river and Firm B will dump 50 fewer tons of pollution into the river.
Explanation:
Firm B will SELL ALL of its allotted 20 permits, and clean up all of its 50 units of pollution. The price per permit will be above $50 each. Firm A will BUY ALL 20 of B's permits. It will then dump 40 tons into the water, and will clean up its remaining 10. The price it pays for a permit will be under $100.
Answer:
Firm B will sell all its permits to Firm A i.e ( lesser chemical dumps into the river )
Explanation:
Firm B will rather sell all its 20 tonnes worth of pollution permit to firm A because it would cause Firm B lesser than Firm A when they dispose off their wastes before it gets to the River hence they will rather dispose off their waste rather than paying/purchasing pollution permits while
Firm A will buy out all of Firm B's allotted pollution permits to reduce the number of tonnes they would dispose off before getting to the river. this is because it would cause them more when they dispose off their waste before getting it to the river. hence the End product of the whole arrangement will be Chemical dumps into the River will be reduced drastically to 40 overall instead of 100 due to the cost of dumping permits.