Answer:
The flaws in China’s political system are obvious. The government doesn’t even make a pretense of holding national elections and punishes those who openly call for multiparty rule. The press is heavily censored and the Internet is blocked. Top leaders are unconstrained by the rule of law. Even more worrisome, repression has been ramped up since Xi Jinping took power in 2012, suggesting that the regime is increasingly worried about its legitimacy.
The Democracy Report
Some China experts—most recently David Shambaugh of George Washington University—interpret these ominous signs as evidence that the Chinese political system is on the verge of collapse. But such an outcome is highly unlikely in the near future. The Communist Party is firmly in power, its top leader is popular, and no political alternative currently claims widespread support. And what would happen if the Party’s power did indeed crumble? The most likely result, in my view, would be rule by a populist strongman backed by elements of the country’s security and military forces. The new ruler might seek to buttress his legitimacy by launching military adventures abroad. President Xi would look tame by comparison.
A more realistic and, arguably, desirable outcome would involve political change that builds on the advantages of the current system. But what exactly are the good parts of the Chinese political model? And how can they be advanced without repression? I believe the model can be improved in a more open political environment and, eventually, put before the people in a popular referendum.
Answer:aloot
Explanation:
The correct answer is false.
It is false that the Virginia colony was founded on the principle that all people should be able to practice their religion freely.
The main purpose of the establishment of the Virginia colony in the Americas was economic. The firsts Europeans in Virginia considered wealth as the basic motivator. They were there for economic reasons They want to be wealthy. They were not driven by the wish to be free regarding religion, they were there to make a profit. That is why British King James I ordered the creation of the Virginia Company of London in 1606.
Answer:
Yes they usually are because people tend to look for easy questions to answer and help people out. Don't get me wrong there are some days where it's a little slow but the most I've had to wait is 20 minutes.
Explanation:
Answer:
what I've seen I'll say they pretty much are
O
A. Many joined unions because of unfair labor laws.
O
B. Many joined unions because of Fordism. A
O
C. Few joined unions because the economy was strong.
O
D. Few joined unions because there were no unions to join.
Answer:
Few joined unions because the economy was strong.
Explanation:
Labor unions were meant to protect wages, but wages no longer needed to be protected once they were fair.
During the Harding administration, few American workers joined unions due to the strong economy and favorable pro-business policies.
During the Harding administration, few American workers joined unions because the economy was strong. Harding implemented pro-business policies that favored employers, such as lowering taxes and reducing regulations. As a result, the economy experienced rapid growth, leading to higher wages and improved working conditions, which reduced the need for labor unions.
#SPJ2
Pharaohs.
Hope this helps!
-Payshence