Answer:
No, I do not think justices should be forced to retire.
Explanation:
In order to ensure that the rule of law is maintained and every arm of government and it's institutions has no influences on justices, justices should not be forced to retire, as long as they are of good behavior and conduct.
The question pertains to the argument of whether the tenure of Supreme Court justices in a democracy should be capped or not. The professor's comment implies that long tenure might hinder dynamic legal interpretations in line with evolving societal values. Whether one supports the traditional life appointment system for justices or not depends on personal perspective.
The law professor's statement likely implies that with the evolving socially progressive landscape, having Supreme Court justices serve for 25 years or more could lead to stagnation in legal interpretation and decision making. Whether the current life appointment system for justices should be changed or not is a matter of personal opinion. Supporters of the current system often argue that it preserves judicial independence and protects the court from political pressures. On the other hand, those in favor of imposing retirement ages for justices often cite the need for fresh perspectives and dynamic legal interpretations that align with current societal values.
#SPJ3
Answer:
A. 40
Explanation:
Calculation for what was the labor productivity, in chairs per worker per day
Using this formula
Labor productivity per day =Company Per day output/ Number of labor
Let plug in the formula
Labor productivity per day= 1600/8 days×5 workers
Labor productivity per day=1,600/40
Labor productivity per day= 40
Therefore the Labor productivity per day will be 40
Answer:
Dennis Kozlowski was found guilty of grand larceny, falsifying business records, securities fraud, and conspiracy. He later admitted to have been driven by excessive greed as he overcompensated himself when he served as CEO of Tyco.
Explanation:
Dennis Kozlowski during his crime trial was found to have received "$81 million in unauthorized bonuses, the purchase of art for $14.725 million, and the payment by Tyco of a $20 million investment banking fee to Frank Walsh, a former Tyco director," according to wikipedia.com.
2 Hired a secretary-receptionist at a salary of $320 per week payable monthly.
3 Purchased supplies on account $830. (Debit an asset account.)
7 Paid office rent of $630 for the month.
11 Completed a tax assignment and billed client $1,360 for services rendered. (Use Service Revenue account.)
12 Received $3,940 advance on a management consulting engagement.
17 Received cash of $2,950 for services completed for Ferengi Co.
21 Paid insurance expense $150.
30 Paid secretary-receptionist $1,280 for the month.
30 A count of supplies indicated that $130 of supplies had been used.
30 Purchased a new computer for $7,000 with personal funds. (The computer will be used exclusively for business purposes.)
Journalize the transactions in the general journal. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No entry" for the account titles and enter 0 for the amounts.)
Answer:
Cash 34,830
Equipment 15,540
Capital Account 50,370
no entry needed
supplies 830
account payable 830
rent expense 630
cash 630
account receivable 1,360
service revenue 1,360
cash 3,940
unearned revenue 3,940
cash 2,950
service revenue 2,950
insurance expense 150
cash 150
wages expense 1,280
cash 1,280
supplies expense 130
supplies 130
Equipment- Computer 7,000
Capital Account 7,000
Explanation:
We must always o debit = credit
and record the entries to reflect the reality.
b. What would be the effect of this purchase on income before income taxes using FIFO method?
Answer:
1. Net income decreases by $3,000
2. The amount of net income would be remains the same.
Explanation:
1. Under LIFO method
(i) Before 8,000 units purchased:
sales = 67,000 units
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (66,000 × $13) + (1,000 × $10)
= $858,000 + $10,000
= $868,000
(ii) If 8,000 units purchased at $13 each then,
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= 67,000 × $13
= $871,000
As the cost of goods increases as a result there will be decrease in the net income before tax under LIFO method.
The amount of net income would be decreased by:
= $871,000 - $868,000
= $3,000
2. Under FIFO method:
(i) Before 8,000 units purchased:
sales = 67,000 units
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (16,000 × $10) + (51,000 × $13)
= $160,000 + $663,000
= $823,000
(ii) If 8,000 units purchased at $13 each then,
Cost of goods sold = Quantity × Price
= (16,000 × $10) + (51,000 × $13)
= $160,000 + $663,000
= $823,000
As there will be no change in the cost of goods sold, so, there will be no change in the net income before tax under FIFO method.
The amount of net income would be remains the same.
Answer:
(A) sales revenue: understated
gross profit: understated
(B) net income: understated
(C) Retained Earnings : understated
Unearned Services: overstated
Explanation:
(A) sales revenue will not represent the real sales attributable for the period. It will be 2,000 lower than it should be.
Ths will make gross profit be understated as well as is the difference between the sales and the COGS
(B) net income is understated as it do not include a revenue for 2,000 thus, is lower.
(C) unearned services is overstated has it should decrease by 2,000
RE is understate as will increase by the 2,00 additional net income.
1. Calculate the percent change in operating income expected.___ %
2. Calculate the operating income expected next year using the percent change in operating income calculated in Requirement 1. $___
Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sales= 5,000 units
Selling price= $75
The unit variable cost= $45
Total fixed cost equals= $49,500
Operating income at 5,000 units sold is $100,500.
Degree of operating leverage= 1.5
Now Head-First expects to increase sales by 10% next year.
1) % Change on income= ?
We know that the degree of operating leverage is calculated by the following formula:
degree of operating leverage= %change in income/ %change in sales
1.5= %change in income/0.10
0.15= %change in income
15%= %change in income
2) Net operating income
Sales= 5,500*75= 412,500
Total variable cost= 5,500*45= (247,500)
Contribution margin= 165,000
Fixed costs= (49,500)
Net operating income= 115,500
Change in income= (115,500 - 100,500)/100,500= 0.1493= 14.93%