Answer:
nonsensical
Explanation:
The sentence doesn't have proper grammar nor does it articulate the point, and the spelling is incorrect. You could try wording it as "If you want, I could bring a loaf of bread to the picnic.", "Do you want me to bring a loaf of bread to the picnic?", or "Did you want me to bring a loaf of bread to the picnic?"
B: The boys follow jack to dance on the beach before the meeting is over
C: Simon fails to speak eloquently and clearly when he has the conch
D: the man parachutes to the mountain
OOOOOF HELP ME AND OTHER PEOPLE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF
O V O OOF . V.
PLEASE USE THE WORD IN AN EASY SENTENCE
LIKE EVEN ELEMENTARY KIDS CAN UNDERSTAND
They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.
B.
They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.
C.
They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.
D.
They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.
The difference between Darwin and Lamarck is They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. Thus the correct option is B.
According to Darwin's theory, all organisms have a shared history, new species evolve from older ones, and species can change over time. Darwin concurred that parents' attributes were passed down to their children.
According to Lamarck's hypothesis, organisms would have worked hard to acquire the characteristic and passed it on to their children if they needed it to thrive in their surroundings.
How a creature acquired a certain property and passed it on is one of the fundamental differences between Lamarck's evolutionary theory and Darwin's theory of evolution.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Darwin's Theory, here:
#SPJ2
Answer: A
Explanation: