Answer:
Economic espionage.
Explanation:
Economic espionage is an activity of unlawfully targeting and spying the sensitive information of corporate or government. The motive behind economic espionage is more than just earning profit, it is much larger in scope and scale. It include theft of critical economic intelligence, trade secret, intellectual property, etc. There are different ways of conducting economic espoinage:
1) Hiring insider of corporate or research institution and getting information on trade secrets etc.
2) By Cyber attack, theft, bribery, etc.
3) Building relationship with corporate or goverment, which seems innocent, however, motive is to gather economic intelligence.
There is Law been passed to protect against economic espionage.
Answer:
$916.35
Explanation:
For this question we use the Present value function that is shown on the attachment. Kindly find it below
Provided that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 6.5% ÷ 2 = 3.25%
NPER = 22 years × 2 years = 44 years
PMT = $1,000 × 5.78% ÷ 2 = $28.9
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the market price of the bond is $916.35
Answer:
Y = 83.2 + 2.29x1 + 1.30x2
Y = 83.2 + 2.29(4) + 1.30(1.5)
Y = 83.2 + 9.16 + 1.95
Y = 94.31(thousand)
Y = $94,310
The gross revenue is $94,310
Explanation:
In this case, the estimated regression equation has been given. Since x1 is $4,000 and x2 is $1,500, then, we will substitute these values for x1 and x2 in the equation. The addition of all values after the substitution gives the gross revenue.
Answer:
Overhead volume balance= $29,400 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
From the following data, calculate the fixed overhead volume variance.
-Actual fixed overhead $40,000
-Budgeted fixed overhead $21,000
-Standard overhead allocation rate $6
-Standard direct labor hours per unit 4 DLHr
-Actual output 2,100.
Overhead volume variance= budgeted fixed overhead - fixed overhead applied= 21,000 - 50,400= 29,400 unfavorable
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
b. If the T-bill rate were 6% and the market return during the period were 14%, which adviser would be the superior stock selector?
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
c. What if the T-bill rate were 3% and the market return 15%?
First Investment Advisor
Second Investment Advisor
Cannot be determined
Answer:
a. Cannot be determined
b. Second Investment Advisor
c. Second Investment Advisor
Explanation:
a. Since all the information is not given in the question so we are not able to give advise. As abnormal return is calculated from subtracting the expected return from the return. But no such information is provided in the question.
b. We know that
Abnormal return = Return - expected return
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
In case of First Investment Advisor:
The return is 19%
And, the expected return equal to
= 6% + 1.5 × (14% - 6%)
= 6% + 1.5 × 8%
= 6% + 12%
= 18%
So abnormal return = 19% - 18% = 1%
In case of Second Investment Advisor:
The return is 16%
And, the expected return equal to
= 6% + 1 × (14% - 6%)
= 6% + 1 × 8%
= 6% + 8%
= 14%
So abnormal return = 16% - 18% = 2%
So, Second Investment Advisor should be accepted as it has high abnormal return then first investment Advisor
c. In case of First Investment Advisor:
The return is 19%
And, the expected return equal to
= 3% + 1.5 × (15% - 3%)
= 3% + 1.5 × 12%
= 3% + 18%
= 21%
So abnormal return = 19% - 21% = -2%
In case of Second Investment Advisor:
The return is 16%
And, the expected return equal to
= 3% + 1 × (15% - 3%)
= 3% + 1 × 12%
= 3% + 12%
= 15%
So abnormal return = 16% - 15% = 1%
So, Second Investment Advisor should be accepted as it has high abnormal return then first investment Advisor
Answer:
Ideas
Explanation:
While doing the business in the financial market the fundamental thing that prior supposed is that of ideas which could be respected
With the ideas of an individual, the individual could accomplish their targets and if there is no ideas than it is impossible to accomplish their goals and objectives
Therefore the ideas would be the answer
b. False
Answer:
According to Ghemawat's CAGE framework, "countries who share a common currency have a greater probability of trading with each other than countries who share a common border."
a. True
Explanation:
The CAGE framework was developed by an international strategy guru, Pankaj Ghemawat. CAGE is a cultural, administrative, geographic, and economic framework. The framework offers businesses a means to evaluate the non-physical distances that exist between countries. With this more-inclusive view of distance, the CAGE framework provides another way for business to consider the location, opportunities, and risks involved in global trade or arbitrage.