Using the z-distribution, as we are working with a proportion, it is found that:
a) ,
b) The p-value is of 0.0075.
c) Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is still of 53%, that is:
At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is now smaller, that is:
Item a:
The hypothesis are:
Item b:
The test statistic is given by:
In which:
In this problem, the parameters are:
.
Hence, the value of the test statistic is given by:
Using a z-distribution calculator, considering a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the proportion is less than a value, with z = -2.43, it is found that the p-value is of 0.0075.
Item c:
Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0075 < 0.01 for the left-tailed test, it is found that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that a smaller proportion of American families own stocks or stock funds in 2012 than 10 years ago.
More can be learned about the z-distribution at brainly.com/question/26454209
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
c) So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=300 represent the random sample taken
estimated proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=99% or 0.99
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
Part a
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that proportion is less than 0.53 or 53%.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Part b
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value .
Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:
Part c
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of American families owning stocks or stock funds is significantly less than 0.53 .
The answer is 70.......
Answer:
28% of 250 is 70
Step-by-step explanation:
If you turn 28% into a decimal it will turn into 0.28 so then multiply that by 250 and you'll get 70
The numbers 8 and 400 have different orders of magnitude. They also possess a ratio relationship, with 400 being 50 times bigger than 8. While not directly related through square and square root, both numbers share these relationships with other numbers.
The relationship between the values 8 and 400 can be understood through the concept of order of magnitude in mathematics. The order of magnitude is a rough measure of the size of a number, typically based on powers of 10.
An important factor in analyzing this relationship is understanding the concept of ratio and interval level data. Unlike interval level data, the ratio between the numbers, in this case 8 and 400, carries meaningful information in a ratio scale data. In this case, 400 is 50 times bigger than 8.
Another mathematical relationship between 8 and 400 is square and square root, since 400 is the square of 20, and 8 is the square root of 64. So, although there is no direct square or square root relationship between 8 and 400, they share these relationships with other numbers.
#SPJ2
Answer:
They both come in the 8 times table.
Please help
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
m∠1 = 180-40= 140° (suplementary angles)
m∠2= 40° (vertical angles are ≅)
m∠3= 140° ( is ≅ to ∠1)
m∠4 = m∠6 = 40° ( same side corresponding ∠s, and vertical angles)
m∠5 = m∠7 = 140° ( same side corresponding ∠s, and vertical angles)
Answer:
m<1=140
m<2= 40
m<3= 140
m<4= 40
m<5=140
m<6= 40
m<7= 140
Answer:
14941.
Step-by-step explanation:
In base 16 we have that :
A=10, B=11, C=12, D=13, E=14, F=15 and the process of change is:
3:
A5D=
3A5D =
8000 because u add an extra 0 if u multiple with a number with a zero or no
slices.
Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
26×3=78
78÷8=9.75
round up to 10 since you can't buy .75 of a pizza