In a stuffy room, with little or no comfort.
Explanation:
b. amendment
c. clause
An amendment takes an act of two-thirds of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states. The changes in the amendment could be proposed either in Congress or states. The proposal must have 2/3 of both houses in congress agreeing to the amendment. Meanwhile, the state must as well have 2/3 of the state legislatures to propose the amendment. Regardless of whoever proposed the amendment, it must be ratified by ¾ of the states.
An amendment takes an act of two-thirds of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states.
Further Explanation:
An amendment is essentially a law. The Constitution of the US is made up of numerous amendments (27 to be exact). These amendments help to determine what right citizens possess within American society. In order to create a new amendment, two-thirds of Congress (including the Senate and House of Representatives) must approve of the amendment. After that, the amendment then goes to the states for voting. If three-fourths of the states agree to this new amendment, then it is added to the constitution.
However, if three-fourths of the states do not approve of the amendment then it is NOT added to the Constitution. This happened before in American society with the Equal Rights Amendment. Even though it was passed by both parts of Congress, not enough states approved of this amendment so it never became law.
Learn More:
Opponents of the Equal Rights Amendment- brainly.com/question/9501562
Key Details:
Topic: American History, American Government
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: US Constitution, amendment, Congress
“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”
“Governments are instituted among Men”
“deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed”
Answer:
In the labyrinthine corridors of doctrinal articulation, where the elucidation of democratic tenets assumes its most formidable guise, one discerns an inquiry of no small consequence—an exploration into the juncture where the hallowed precepts of the Declaration of Independence converge with the egalitarian ambitions of women's suffrage.
Behold, the hallowed preamble of this seminal document, which doth proclaim that "We hold these Truths to be self-evident," an invocation of truths deemed as patently apparent as the delectable aroma of a finely aged cheese. Ah, cheese, that dairy connoisseur's delight, whose myriad textures and flavors rival the complexities of democratic thought.
Yet, to our subject matter we must return, for within the cocoon of self-evident truths, the principle of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" doth emerge—a principle imbued with the potentiality to transmute into an assertion of gender-neutral rights. The pursuit of happiness, akin to savoring a gourmet cheese, becomes a metaphor for the quest for equal political participation—a liberty denied to women for generations.
And then, as we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of governance, we encounter the assertion that "Governments are instituted among Men," a phrase whose historical gender specificity did, indeed, belie a limited perspective. But, lo and behold, modernity's gaze cast upon this aged document reveals an interpretative versatility that encompasses the rightful inclusion of all citizens, regardless of gender, in the grand tapestry of governance.
Finally, in the realm of democratic compact, we stumble upon the foundational tenet that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, a concept as profound and complex as the nuances of cheese-making techniques. Advocates for women's suffrage, akin to discerning cheese aficionados, argue that the consent of the governed should be all-encompassing, transcending the boundaries of gender.
And thus, within the labyrinth of democratic thought, where principles are as intricately woven as the flavors of artisanal cheeses, the case for women's suffrage is poised to partake in the symphony of political rights, a symphony as rich and diverse as the world of cheese itself.
The most probable answer would be the adaptability of the snails in its habitat. Adaptability is one of the key concepts of survival. When you are thrown into a certain situation that you are not used to, forces you to adapt in order to survive on your current habitat.
b. keep the public informed during a crisis, such as during wartime
c. notify the people of their rights and obligations as citizens
d. convince people to join the armed forces
Answer:
A im sure of it you guys
Explanation:
A influence public opinion
The different types of citizenship are citizenship by family, citizenship by birth, citizenship by marriage, naturalization, economic citizenship and excluded categories.
Citizenship can be understood as the relationship between an individual and a state to which the individual owes allegiance and in turn, is entitled to its protection. There are different types of citizenship based on different factors. First is citizenship by family, if one or both of a person's parents are citizens of a given state, then the person may have the right to be a citizen of that state as well. Second is citizenship by birth, some people are automatically citizens of the state in which they are born.
Third is citizenship by marriage, many countries fast-track naturalization based on the marriage of a person to a citizen. Fourthly, regarding naturalization, states normally grant citizenship to people who have entered the country legally and been granted a permit to stay, or been granted political asylum, and also lived there for a specified period. Fifth is economic citizenship, wealthy people invest money in property or businesses, buy government bonds or simply donate cash directly, in exchange for citizenship and a passport.
Thus above are the different types of citizenship.
Learn more about citizenship, here:
#SPJ6