Answer: 3,125 UNITS
Explanation:
According to the question above, the seasonal relatives for each quarter for the current year financials has been calculated thus:
1st quarter 0.5
2nd quarter 1.0
3rd quarter 1.25
4th quarter 1.25
using the above relatives to calculate what the next fiscal year order will be:
Total relatives above = 4.0
for the 4th quarter for the next year order :
= 1.25/4.0 * forecasted qty to be ordered for the next fiscal year
=1.25/4.0 * 10,000
0.3125 * 10,000
=3,125 units will be ordered in the forth quarter of the next fiscal year.
The number of units that would be ordered in the next fiscal year would be 3125
The financial report
The first quarter = 0.5
The second quarter = 1.0
The third quarter = 1.25
The fourth quarter = 1.25
0.5+1+1.25+1.25 = 4
The relatives are 4
= 0.3125
The number of the units in the fiscal year would be 0.3125*10000
= 3,125 units
Read more on fiscal year here: brainly.com/question/25812320
Answer:
See explanations below
Explanation:
Kind find attached solution. Please note that 3,300 units was used for the alternative.
b. $18.00 per hour.
c. $1,000 per loan.
d. $800 per loan.
Answer:
overhead rate = 18 per hours
Explanation:
given data
indirect costs = $396,000
Department DLH Loans Processed Direct Costs
Consumer 14,000 700 $280,000
Commercial 8,000 300 $180000
to find out
overhead rate
solution
we get here overhead rate that is express as
overhead rate = ...............1
put here value
overhead rate =
overhead rate = 18 per hours
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": total value from trade in a market.
Explanation:
Canadian economist Alex Tabarrok (born in 1966) explains social surplus as the sum of consumer surplus, producer surplus, and bystanders surplus. Tabarrok takes an integrative approach in consumer surplus by stating social surplus encompasses every economic trade in the market rather than only consumers and producers surplus.
Besides, Tabarrok believes when there are major external costs or benefits, the market will not reach its social surplus.
Social surplus is the combination of consumer surplus and producer surplus, taking into account the price that consumers are willing to pay based on their preferences, and the price that producers are willing to sell their product at, based on their costs.
The question asked here is: Social surplus is the ____________. The correct answer to this question is that social surplus is the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus. This concept falls under economic principles. Consumer surplus is the difference between the price that consumers are willing to pay based on their preferences, and the actual market equilibrium price. On the other hand, producer surplus is the gap between the price at which producers are willing to sell a product, based on their costs, and the market equilibrium price. Combining both these surpluses gives the social surplus.
#SPJ3
Answer:
PTM $ 1,225,900.379
Explanation:
We will calculate the present value of the contract.
Then we will increase by 1,200,000
Next, we subtract the 9.2 bonus payable today
and distribute the rest under quarter payments:
We use present value of a lump sum
0 5,700,000 5,700,000
1 4,300,000 4,102,588.223
2 4,800,000 4,369,383.7
3 5,300,000 4,603,035.135
4 6,700,000 5,551,785.732
5 7,400,000 5,850,312.795
6 8,200,000 6,185,156.501
Then we add them: 36,362,262.09
We increase by 1,200,000
and subtract the 9,200,000 initial payment
28,362,262.09
this is the present value fothe quarterly payment
Next we calculate the equivalent compound rate per quarter:
equivalent rate: 0.002954634
Now we claculate the PTM of an annuity of 24 quearter at this rate:
PV $28,362,262.09
time 24
rate 0.002954634
PTM $ 1,225,900.379
Answer:
$20,000
Explanation:
Time difference from the "Purchase date" to "Sale date" = 9 years (1/1/2007 to 1/1/2016)
Given that, in the 9 years, Troy rented the home for first 5 years (1/1/2007 to 1/1/2012), and lived in the home as his principal residence for next 1 year(1/1/2012 to 31/12/2012)
and again rented out the home for 1 year (1/1/2013 to 31/12/2013), and again started to lived in the home as his principal residence for next 2 years. (1/1/2014 to 1/1/2016)
i.e. when we look at the last 5 years before the sale of house, Troy has lived 3 years in the home as his principal residence.
And Troy has acquired the home for $300,000 and not acquired by "like kind exchange" of property.
As per IRS rules, a owner must live at least 2 years in the home as his principal residence & home must not be acquired by 1031 exchange (like/kind exchange).
Here, Troy satisfies both conditions. (He has lived more than 2 years, and not acquired by like/kind exchange)
So, as per above rules, Troy's home sale is eligible for Maximum exclusion of $250,000 gain (being Troy is Single)
Here, as per IRS rules, Gain = Amount Realized / Adjusted Basis = $320,000 - $300,000 = $20,000.
But, being Troy home sale is eligible for Maximum exclusion of $250,000, this $20,000 gain is deducted and Net Gain = $0.
Troy's gain on the sale of his home is $20,000. However, he is eligible to exclude this gain from taxation because he lived in the home as his principal residence for 2 out of the 5 years leading up to the sale, as per IRS guidelines.
Troy's gain on his home sale depends on his usage of the property and the IRS's rules on excluding gains from the sale of a principal residence. According to these rules, a person can generally exclude the gain up to $250,000 from the sale of a principal residence if they owned the house and lived in it as their main home for at least 2 out of the last 5 years before the sale. The years of ownership and use don't need to be consecutive.
Troy purchased the home in 2007 and sold it in 2016. He rented the home initially then lived in it as his principal residence, then rented it again, and lived in it again until the sale. Combining these periods, he lived in the house as his principal residence for only 3 years (2012, 2014, 2015). However, these years are within the 5-year window before the sale (2012-2016).
Troy's recognized gain is the selling price of the home minus the purchase price. Thus, his recognized gain is $320,000 - $300,000 = $20,000. However since he lived in the residence for 2 out of the 5 years before the sale, this gain is excluded from taxation, according to IRS rules.
#SPJ13
Year 1 $350,000
Year 2 $475,000
Year 3 $400,000
Year 4 $475,000
Which of the following is the correct calculation of project Delta’s IRR?
A. 5.01%
B. 5.51%
C. 4.26%
D. 6.01%
Answer:
Correct option is A 5.01%
Explanation:
Let irr be x%
At irr,present value of inflows=present value of outflows.
1,500,000=350,000/1.0x+475,000/1.0x^2+400,000/1.0x^3+475000/1.0x^4
Hence x=irr=5.01%(Approx).