Which of the following is true about electronic surveillance? Select all that apply.A. Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
B. Police may place surveillance devices on suspected criminals’ phones
C. Police can plant viruses on smartphones of suspected drug runners.
D. Private citizens can monitor other people’s telephone calls.
E. Private citizens can record their own telephone calls in most states.

Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.

Option A

Explanation:

The Supreme Court of America has made and landmark judgements in electronic surveillance like tapping phone calls and accessing the phone records.

It stated that without a proper warrant if the police department carry out electronic surveillance means it amounts to be illegal, it is a breach of privacy of individuals.

So, the top court has issued guidelines before proceeding with the electronic surveillance. This judgement of preserving the right of the individual is considered to be the major policy decision taken by the court.

Final answer:

In the legal context of electronic surveillance, police typically need a warrant to monitor phone calls and can only place surveillance devices with a warrant. Private citizens generally cannot lawfully monitor others' calls, and recording their own calls varies by state law.

Explanation:

The aspects of electronic surveillance you've listed differ in their legality and are governed by different laws and guidelines. Here's a breakdown of each option:

• A is true. In general, police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls due to the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Such a warrant is obtained through showing probable cause to a judge.
• B is also true, provided they have obtained a warrant. Without a warrant, this action could infringe on a person's rights to privacy.
• C is not typically true. Viruses may constitute a form of cybercrime, but law enforcement can use certain types of software tools in their investigations, assuming they comply with the law and proper procedures.
• D is generally false. In most jurisdictions, it is illegal for private citizens to monitor other people's phone calls without consent.
• The truth of E depends on the specific state laws. Some states require two-party consent, while others require just a single party's consent to record conversations.

Learn more about Electronic Surveillance here:

brainly.com/question/33487087

#SPJ12