Answer:
b) The comma attempts to join two independent clauses.
Explanation:
When two ideas come together and either one of them can stand by itself as its own, independent sentence, then the use of the comma is correct:
Comma + a conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so)
Based on the information, b.The comma attempts to join two independent clauses. The correct option is B
When two ideas come together and either one of them can stand by itself as its own, independent sentence, then the use of the comma is correct:
Comma + a conjunction (and, but, for, nor, yet, or, so)
In the sentence, there is no compound predicate to separate. The sentence only contains a single predicate ("is a traveling exhibition"), so the comma does not serve a grammatical purpose in this context.
The correct option is B
Learn more about comma
#SPJ6
A. Henry uses irony to highlight the love Jim and Della feel for each other, whereas Maupassant uses irony to emphasize the rewards of hard work.
B. Henry uses irony to surprise the reader in the foolishness of Jim and Della, while Maupassant uses irony to focus attention on the result of the Loisels' errors in judgment.
C. Henry uses irony as a means of communicating the depths of the Youngs' love for one another, while Maupassant's use of irony communicates the needless suffering caused by the Loisels' pride. ***
D. The effect of O. Henry's use of irony is hilarious, while the effect of Maupassant's use of irony is tragic.
Answer:
the answer is B
( Henry uses irony to surprise the reader in the foolishness of Jim and Della, while Maupassant uses irony to focus attention on the result of the Loisels' errors in judgment. )
Explanation:
(:
B. Allen asked, "Will you be there at 8:30, as you promised?"
C. I just read a magazine article called "Life Is Learning."
D. "This is too much!" she said, "I will not abide it!"
B. Paraphrasing an article from a medical journal
C. Constructing a personal narrative without research
D. Borrowing idea structure from an essay on hockey
Constructing a personal narrative without research wouldn't constitute plagiarism. Therefore, option C is correct.
The act of presenting someone else's ideas or work as your own, with or without that person's consent, by incorporating it into your work without giving it due credit, is known as plagiarism. This definition applies to all works, both published and unpublished, whether they are in manuscript, print, or electronic form.
It is unethical in the first place since it is a sort of theft. You are stealing someone else's intellectual property when you use their words and ideas and claim them to be your own. Second, it is unethical because the person who copied the work went on to profit from the theft.
Thus, constructing a personal narrative without research wouldn't constitute plagiarism. Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about plagiarism, here:
#SPJ2
A. Became
B. Desert
C. Very
D. Because
Answer:D
Explanation: