In a city known for many tech start-ups, 311 of 800 randomly selected college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000. In another city known for biotech firms, 334 of 800 randomly selected college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000. Perform a two-proportion hypothesis test to determine whether there is a difference in the proportions of college graduates with outstanding student loans who currently owe more than $50,000 in these two cities. Use α=0.05. Assume that the samples are random and independent. Let the first city correspond to sample 1 and the second city correspond to sample 2. For this test: H0:p1=p2; Ha:p1≠p2, which is a two-tailed test. The test results are: z≈−1.17 , p-value is approximately 0.242

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2)=0  

Alternative hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2) \neq 0  

z=\frac{0.389-0.418}{\sqrt{0.403(1-0.403)((1)/(800)+(1)/(800))}}=-1.182    

p_v =2*P(Z<-1.182)=0.2372  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we don't have significant difference between the two proportions.  

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

X_(1)=311 represent the number college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 (tech start-ups)

X_(2)=334 represent the number college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 ( biotech firms)

n_(1)=800 sample 1

n_(2)=800 sample 2

p_(1)=(311)/(800)=0.389 represent the proportion of college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 (tech start-ups)

p_(2)=(334)/(800)=0.418 represent the proportion of college graduates with outstanding student loans currently owe more than $50,000 ( biotech firms)

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

\alpha=0.05 significance level given

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference in the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2)=0  

Alternative hypothesis:p_(1) - p_(2) \neq 0  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_(1)-p_(2)}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)((1)/(n_(1))+(1)/(n_(2)))}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=(X_(1)+X_(2))/(n_(1)+n_(2))=(311+334)/(800+800)=0.403  

3) Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.389-0.418}{\sqrt{0.403(1-0.403)((1)/(800)+(1)/(800))}}=-1.182    

4) Statistical decision

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z<-1.182)=0.2372  

Comparing the p value with the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that we don't have significant difference between the two proportions.  


Related Questions

Anna said that the product of 7/8 ⋅ 1 1/2 =7/2. How can you tell that her answer is wrong/
In the figure, side AB is given by the expression (5x + 5)/(x + 3), and side BC is (3x + 9)/(2x - 4).The simplified expression for the area of rectangle ABCD is _______, and the restriction on x is ____.
Find the sum? Enter your answer in simplest form 1/8 +5/6
Angle 1 is congruent to angle 2 prove p is parallel to q
Emily simplified this expression. Expression: (5−2)2+23×4 Step 1: (3)2+23×4 Step 2: 9+23×4 Step 3: 9+9×4 Step 4: 9+36 Step 5: 45 Emily made a mistake. Which step shows her first mistake? Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4​

In some division problems, a number or pattern of number that continues indefinitely is a?

Answers

my guess would be a repeating decimal or an infinite decimal.

Solve for x. Round to the nearest tenth. triangle 67, 29, x​

Answers

Final answer:

To solve for x in a triangle with side lengths of 67, 29, and x, we can use the Law of Cosines. The value of x is approximately 47.6.

Explanation:

To solve for x in the given triangle with side lengths 67, 29, and x, we can use the Law of Cosines. The Law of Cosines states that for any triangle with side lengths a, b, and c and angle C opposite side c, the following equation holds true: c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab*cos(C). In this case, we can substitute the given values into the equation and solve for x. Let's calculate it:

x^2 = 67^2 + 29^2 - 2*67*29*cos(C)

x^2 = 4489 + 841 - 3886cos(C)

Solving for x, we find that x is approximately 47.6.

Learn more about Law of Cosines here:

brainly.com/question/21634338

#SPJ12

Answer:

84°

Step-by-step explanation:

Because every triangle has a combined side length of 180°

67+29=96°

180-96=84°

Reduce the following fraction to lowest terms: 8/14

Answers

Answer:

4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

divide both by two for its simplest form

Answer:4/7

Step-by-step explanation

Divide both the numerator and denominator by 2

The result for the numerator is 8/2=4

that of the denominator is 14/2=7

Therefore the resultant answer is 4/7

Which expression best represents the cube

Answers

Step-by-step explanation:

The following is a list of perfect Cubes

13 = 1

23 = 8

33 = 27

43 = 64

53 = 125

63 = 216

73 = 343

83 = 512

93 = 729

103 = 1000

If a variable with an exponent has an exponent which is divisible by 3 then it is a perfect cube. To get the cube root, we simply divide the exponent by 3. For example x9 is a perfect cube, its cube root is x3 . x11 is not a perfect cube.

What is 4x-5x= x- 20

Answers

Answer: the answer is x=10

Answer:   −2x + 20 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

European car company advertises that theircar gers 9.4 Kilometers per liter of gasoline. Convert
this figure to miles per galllon

Answers

Answer:

22.11 miles per gallon

Step-by-step explanation:

1 km = 0.621371 miles

1 litre = 0. 264172 gallon

Given

Mileage of car =  9.4 Milometers per liter of gasoline

Mileage of car = 9.4 Km/ litres

now we will use 0.621371 miles for Km and 0. 264172 gallon for litres

Mileage of car = 9.4 * 0.621371 miles/ 0. 264172 gallon

Mileage of car = 9.4 * 2.3521 miles/ gallon

Mileage of car = 22.11  miles/ gallon

Thus, 9.4 Km/litres is same as 22.11 miles per gallon.