Answer:
The answer to the statement: All nurturing environments are protective but not all productive environments are nurturing, would be True.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the case is that sometimes, productive environments can become more stress inducers for people, therefore, they will not be nurturing for the person, but rather harmful. And the essence of a nurtuting environment is that it gives the person in it the necessary tools to thrive, grow, develop, and feel safe and fulfilled. Productive environments can tend to become nurturing, when they have the conditions to generate these feelings of safety, fulfillment and enjoyment. But when productive environments are messy, chaotic, or stress-inducers, they no longer become nurturing. This is why it is true when the statement says that NOT ALL productive environments are nurturing.
Life is not a fairy tale and this is sadly the reality we live in.
Answer:
This is an expression that basically means something like: "yes, but we are in real life."
Explanation:
Often used to bring someone back from reality after an enthusiastic discourse about something that most likely will not happen, this expression basically means that, unfortunately, it going to stay an imaginary thing; reality is quite different than fantasy.
B. Iconoclasts believed that no single person should lead the church
C. Iconoclasts believed it was blasphemy to worship religious objects
D. Iconoclasts believed in worshipping religious objects
Answer: C)Iconoclasts believed it was blasphemy tp wotship religious objects
Explanation:
Answer: I'm not 100% sure but I think its D
Explanation:
B. plessy v. ferguson was that separate but equal facilities were violations of the constitution
C. brown v. board of education was that former slaves had a right to petition to court system.
D. brown v. board of education was that former slaves had no right to petition to court system.
The correct answer is A.
The "separate but equal" lemma that was accepted in the decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated public facilities under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality (for example, schools or public transport), such system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.