Answer:
If by the word Eloquence we are to understand the art of exalting patriotism, moderating customs, and directing the interests of society, it is necessary to confess that the ancients bring great advantages to the modern ones; Or to put it better, they are our admiration today, since they cannot be our model. But if we stick their primitive and general meaning to the Elocution, our effects owed their credit and authority to the ancient leaders, and the first speakers their triumph, we will have to agree on vulgar languages, although less rich, flexible, and harmonious than Greek and Roman, have produced writers, equal to those of those times in the nobility, grace, and colorful expression, when not superior in production, greatness, and truth of ideas. And since they must remain permanently unalterable, we can identify them better than diction, which is disfigured, or lost in translations.
In many speakers of antiquity we read the common lawsuits of our lawyers: private claims, domestic facts, personal grievances, legal evidence, ordinary language, neat details, power to yawn who is not a judge, party, or employer. Only the feathers of Salustio and Tacitus know how to make interesting the smallest things, and give greatness to the smallest facts, not because of the expression they wear, but because they always present them in relation to politics, and the revolutions of the Roman Empire . Let us confess, then, that only a blind enthusiast of all that is not thought, says, and does in his time can find dignity, beauty, and interest in most of the forensic causal causes, which he cannot move but the one he feared or expected the judgment of his judgments. Our Supreme Courts, those of France, and England producing wise and jealous magistrates, who in defense of justice, the civil property of man, and the law of Sovereignty have shone the efficacy and gravity of eloquence. But these men live with us, speak our language, have our defects; and this is enough not to be read or celebrated.
Answer:
C. The parties with a larger number of customers are associated with the longer times elapsed until the party left the restaurant.
Explanation:
The relationship between the number of customers in a party and the time elapsed until the party left the restaurant is linear, that is, the parties with a larger number of customers are associated with the longer times elapsed until the party left the restaurant.
The number of customers in a party at the restaurant and the time elapsed until the party left the restaurant is strongly, positively correlated.
The correlation of 0.78 indicates a strong, positive linear relationship between the size of a customer party and the time they spend at the restaurant. But it does not prove causation.
The correlation of 0.78 suggests a fairly strong, positive relationship between the size of the party at the restaurant and the time spent in the restaurant by the party. This means that as the number of customers in a party increases, the time elapsed until the party leaves also tends to increase. The correlation coefficient, 0.78, is significantly different from zero, indicating a significant linear relationship between these two variables. However, it's important to remember that correlation doesn't indicate causation. While these variables are associated, we can't definitively say that increasing party size causes longer stays at the restaurant without additional data or experimental evidence.
#SPJ11
What is the correct answer if that is not? My answer choices are:
A) Fiscally responsible individuals would not take the risk of investments.
B) Most investments have a guarantee of high returns in a short period of time.
C) Individuals delay the satisfaction from purchases now for possible greater returns later.
D) Investments give individuals greater returns now rather than delaying the satisfaction until a later date.
(b) 106 Days
(c) 146 Days
Gender-schema theory suggests that gender-associated information is predominantly transmitted through society by way of schemata.
Gender-schema theory proposes that children learn gender roles and stereotypes from their culture and environment by actively constructing mental representations, or "schemas," of what it means to be male or female. These schemas guide the child's perception, interpretation, and memory of information related to gender, and thus influence their behavior and attitudes.
According to this theory, children develop gender schemas early in life by observing and categorizing the behaviors, interests, and traits of people in their environment as either male or female. Once these gender schemas are established, they can influence the child's interpretation of new information and their behavior in gender-typed ways.
In contrast to social learning theory, which emphasizes the role of reinforcement and punishment in shaping behavior, gender-schema theory emphasizes the role of cognitive processes and mental representations in guiding behavior.
learn more about Gender-schema theoryHere:
#SPJ11
income tax rates were raised across the board.
the closing of the Reading Railroad.
bank dividends came to an end for borrowers.
The closing of the reading railroad caused many banks that were investing in it to go bankrupt and then on a long chain of things that went horribly wrong to cause the HUGE panic of 1893. Pls mark branliest even though this is 3yrs late LOL.