Answer:
The disaster at the Bay of Pigs had a lasting impact on the Kennedy administration. Determined to make up for the failed invasion, the administration initiated Operation Mongoose—a plan to sabotage and destabilize the Cuban government and economy, which included the possibility of assassinating Castro.
Answer:
Djibouti
Explanation:
Answer:
Monarchy abolished in France. ... In 1789, food shortages and economic crises led to the outbreak of the French Revolution. King Louis and his queen, Mary-Antoinette, were imprisoned in August 1792, and in September the monarchy was abolished.
Hope this helped!
*eliza*
Answer:
Explanation:
Not always. In fact, there have been
four presidential elections in which
the winner did not receive a majority
of the popular vote. The first of these was
John Quincy Adams in the election of 1824, and the
most recent occurred in 2000 in the presidential race
between george w. Bush and Al gore.
How does this happen?
The answer lies in the “Electoral College.” The
drafters of the U.S. Constitution sought to create a
system that balanced the interests of the (then) 13 states
and those of the American people. voters chose the
members of the House of representatives, but state
legislatures (also elected by the people) elected
U.S. senators. And states sent delegates to a body—
the Electoral College—that chose the president and Americans later amended the Constitution
to make the system more democratic. Beginning
in 1913, U.S. senators were elected directly by the
people. And while the Electoral College still officially
elects the president, the people choose the Electoral
College members.
Here’s how it works.
After the nationwide presidential election is held
in November, the Electoral College meets in december.
In most states, electors cast their votes based on how
the majority of voters in their state voted. The electors
vote in their states on december 15, and Congress
officially counts the results in January.
Each state has a number of electors equal to the
number of its members in the U.S. House of representatives—determined by a census of the the state’s population, plus its two senators. The district of Columbia,
which is not a state and has no voting representation
in Congress, has three Electoral College votes.
There are 538 electors in the Electoral
College; 270 electoral votes are needed to
win the presidential election.
most states award electoral votes on a
winner-take-all basis. The presidential ticket that
gets the most citizens’ votes receives all that state’s
electoral votes. Two states—Nebraska and maine—have experimented
with awarding their electoral votes proportionately
based on citizens’ votes. presidential election strategy
consists of “carrying” a combination of states that
adds up to 270 electoral votes. Election results can
turn on the electoral votes in a handful of competitive
state races.
one consequence of the winner-take-all system
is that a candidate can win the most votes nationally
but lose the election.
Imagine that a candidate wins a state by a small
margin and that state has a lot of electoral votes. That
candidate would still receive all of the electoral votes.
So if a candidate wins in California by a small margin,
they get all 55 of California’s electoral votes. That same
candidate may lose in other, smaller states by large
margins and receive fewer popular votes than his
or her opponent. But that candidate would still have
the edge in the Electoral College. I hoped it's helps .
A presidential candidate can win the most popular votes but not win the election due to the operation of the U.S. Electoral College. In most states, whoever wins the most votes secures all of that state's electoral votes (winner-take-all system).
The reason why a presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes might not win the election is due to the operation of the U.S. Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of people known as electors who are indirectly selected to vote for the president. The winning candidate only needs to secure a majority of these electoral votes, not the majority of a nationwide popular vote.
For example, in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, garnering over 2.9 million more nationwide votes than Donald Trump. However, Trump won more electoral votes because he received the majority of votes in several key states, a reflection of the winner-take-all system employed by most states. This system means the candidate with the most votes in a state wins all of the state's electoral votes.
U.S. elections are based on plurality voting, a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes wins. A candidate does not necessarily need to receive 51% (a majority) of the total votes. Cases also exist where votes for third party candidates draw sufficient votes away from a major candidate, altering the distribution of electoral votes. In sum, the U.S. Electoral College and the winner-take-all voting system can result in scenarios where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the popular vote.
#SPJ2
Complete sentences plz ANWSER
ANSWER:
Most African American lost most of their rights after the reconstruction era.
EXPLANATION:
after reconstruction, the african americans rights that they gained after the civil war were taken away. black codes, by the southerners, were laws that tried to take away the african american's rights as much as possible. the kkk was a group that terrorized some poor white males and african american families. they killed and tortured the families.
Because Mesopotamia didn't really have many natural barriers that could help keep out intruders, it was prone to attacks. Even if the Mesopotamians built their own defenses, it wouldn't be nearly as as good as a mountain or if they were on a hill. the only natural barrier they had was really the two rivers, Tigris and Euphrates. but since it was near the middle of their land, it really wasn't much of a barrier, unless they were trying to escape to the other side.
The open plains and major rivers of Mesopotamia made it a fertile and wealthy region, but also prone to invasions due to lack of natural barriers.
The geography of Mesopotamia was such that it was located in an open plain between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This made it fertile for farming but also left it vulnerable to invasions. There were few natural barriers, such as mountains or oceans, that would deter invaders. The flat terrain and the major rivers facilitated the movement of invading armies. In addition, the wealth of the land due its productive agriculture and trade attracted many neighboring civilizations
As a result of these geographical factors, Mesopotamia faced a long history of invasions and conquests by various empires and civilizations, leading to the rise and fall of numerous city-states and kingdoms in the region. The vulnerability imposed by its geography was a defining feature of the history of Mesopotamia.
#SPJ1