What was the greatest difference in the electorate of the late 1820s compared to the electorate at the beginning of the century? a. Voters in the 1820s were much better educated than those of the 1800s.
b. More women, blacks, and Native Americans could vote in the 1820s. Many more people could vote because suffrage was almost universal for white men.
c. There were fewer voters in the 1820s because of property ownership requirements.
What was the greatest difference in the electorate of the late 1820s compared to the elector?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The greatest difference in the electorate of the late 1820's compared to the electorate at the beginning of the century was there were fewer voters in the 1820's. The reason for the few voters was because of the property ownership requirements. This left the poor people unable to vote. 
Answer 2
Answer: It's definitely not B, since women didn't gain the right to vote until 1920. A doesn't sound right either, so I'm guessing C. I know about the Grandfather Clause as a part of Jim Crow Laws, and there were definitely poll taxes imposed. But I'm not sure if that's the right time period or not. 


Related Questions

How did people of the Old Stone Age find food? a. They farmed in small groups b. They bartered for it with other villages c. They hunted wild animals and gathered fruits and nuts d. They domesticated animals and raised them for slaughter
4. The last great empire centered in Southwest Asia was the _______ Empire. A. Byzantine B. Mongol C. Roman D. Ottoman
What research element is the most essential to sociologists?
What is an example of ottonian architecture
Choose all that apply. Evidence of more sophisticated religious beliefs includes _____. buildings constructed for public purposes placement of human remains crosses on buildings embalming rituals

Which of the following was the question at the heart of the brown v. board of education case?

Answers

The main question at the heart of the brown v. board of education case was whether segregating white and black children in different schools was unconstitutional or not. It was ruled that the segregation of schools was unequal and this paved the way for integration and was a key turning point in the Civil Rights Movement. However, this only applied to public schools because they were the only state-controlled institutions.

Answer:

Do separate schools based on race deprive minority children of rights?

Explanation:

just took test got right :)

Which of the following is the main way in which citizens participate in the government of the United States?A. by voting

B. by watching TV

C. by playing sports

D. by buying goods

Answers

A. By voting
The United States doesn't really have any other way for citizens to voice their opinions and participate in government except by voting. We choose who we want to lead the country by voting for senators and congressman. We don't really vote for who becomes president because that is decided by the electoral college, so that is why it is very important to vote for who we want in Congress making that decision.
A.By Voting because all the american citizens come together as one to vote for something.

In which court case was a quota system used as an affirmative action plan ruled unconstitutional? a. University of California v. Bakke
b. Green v County School Board
c. Brown v. Board of Education
d. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg

Answers

The court case that was a quota system used as an affirmative action plan and was ruled unconstitutional was the university of California v. Bakke. The correct answer is A. 

The correct option is A

It was a historic decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. He endorsed affirmative action, allowing the race to be one of several factors in the admission policy to the university. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as 16 out of 100 seats reserved for minority students by the Davis School of Medicine at the University of California, were inadmissible.

Which aspect of the Cold War mentality was represented by President Truman's establishing of loyalty review boards? the fear of Soviet military expansion in Latin America the desire to spread American values to oppressed peoples the fear of communist infiltration of the federal government the desire to aid viable anti-communist governments around the world

Answers

Cold War mentality was represented by President Truman's establishment of loyalty review boards as the fear of communist infiltration of the federal government. Thus the correct answer is C.

What was Cold War mentality?

A cold war is a condition of international conflict characterized by the absence of open military conflict and the achievement of objectives mostly by economic and political operations.

A board committee called the Loyalty Review Board is in charge of looking into accusations of government betrayal and dismissing convicts. Due to some people's interest in communism, LRB was crucial for preserving democracy.

Therefore, option C the fear of communist infiltration of the federal government was the aspect of Cold War mentality.

Learn more about loyalty review boards, here:

brainly.com/question/13734118

#SPJ2

One aspect of the Cold War mentality that was represented by President Truman's establishing of loyalty review boards was "the fear of communist infiltration of the federal government," since this was at the crux of the "red scare" in America.

One effect of the Alien and Sedition Acts was toA. limit the power of the Democratic Republican Party.

B. prevent juries from acquitting innocent immigrants.

C. provoke a crisis that briefly united the nation against France.

D. uphold the tradition of presuming a person innocent until proved guilty.

Answers

One effect of the Alien and Sedition Acts was to limit the power of the Democratic Republican party. This is because the Democratic Republican party was speaking out against the government. These acts eventually prompted and laid the foundation for our Freedom of Speech constitutional right.

What issues divided China and the Soviet union?

Answers

Relations between TSU and China reach the breaking point as the two governments engage in an angry ideological debate about the future of communism