Answer: that animals have no understanding or feelings.
Both Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are hunters in the story "The Most Dangerous Game." They are able to participate in this activity due to their beliefs. They both think that animals have no feelings, or ability to reason. This is what makes it so exciting for Zaroff to hunt a man. He believes that, because men can think, they provide a different and more interesting challenge.
At the start of 'The Most Dangerous Game,' Rainsford and Zaroff would agree that hunting is a noble sport. However, their motivations differ: Rainsford enjoys the challenge and skill, whereas Zaroff pursues the thrill, even to the point of hunting humans.
At the beginning of "The Most Dangerous Game," both Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff would agree that hunting is a noble sport. Both characters, at this point, see hunting as a thrilling pursuit and a test of one's skills, albeit they have different reasons for doing so.
It's important to understand that the elaborate set-up of the plot soon reveals stark differences in their views, leading to tension and conflict in the story.
Rainsford values the sport for its challenge and the skill it requires. Zaroff, on the other hand, views hunting as a game of life and death, taking pleasure in hunting humans because he finds hunting animals too easy and no longer thrilling.
It is these contrasting philosophies about hunting that sets the stage for the main conflict in the story.
#SPJ6
Christine ran slower than her sister.
B.
Polly sometimes eats dinner early.
C.
The wind blew fiercely through the trees.
D.
We finished the zoo tour most rapidly.
The correct answer is "Terza rima". Terza rima, which literally means "third rhyme" in Italian, follows the triplets rhymed in an ABA BCB CDC DED format. This rhyming verse stanza formed of an interlocking three-line rhyme scheme was first used by Dante Alighieri.
Answer:
DICTION
Explanation:
edge2020
An appositive is a noun or pronoun that identifies and / or explains another noun or pronoun in the same sentence. In this case, the noun is of the phrase is "Mr. smith". This noun is identified and explained by an appositive, which in the phrase is "our lawyer".
The expression "our lawyer" is identifying and explaining who and what Mr. Smith is.