Why did Charles J. Guiteau shoot President Garfield?A) Guiteau was upset because he was not given a government job.

B) Guiteau wanted Charles A. Arthur to become president.

C) Guiteau was a supporter of the spoils system and Garfield believed that the most qualified for the job would get it.

D) Guiteau believed in women's rights and felt that he would gain attention for women's rights by assassinating the president.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: A. He was offended because he was rejected by Garfield.

Related Questions

Which is an example of a theme? 1 hard work pays off in the end 2 a character learns a new skill 3 Marcus is a talented and intelligent man 4 the world and all its many splendors
which president's sacrificed his popularity do you keep the country out of the war between France and England in the late 1700s
What impact did the new deal have on various ethnic groups
What was the most significant result of the Marshall plan
Under the Albany plan of union, the American colonies would have been ruled by

Why does our society have more goods and services to offer

Answers

if the nation in question is America then the reason why our society has much more to offer than other society is because American society has the largest diversity than any other nation.

hope this helps!

How was Sparta able to defeat Athens at the end of the Peloponnesian war

Answers

Sparta had always been good at war because they were well trained from their childhood.

I guess this is the reason that helped Sparta to win against Athens.

90 points!!What impact did the Emancipation Proclamation have on the Civil War and on African Americans? Be sure to discuss social
political and economic impact on African-Americans in your paragraph.

Please write one paragraph containing 5-7 complete sentences!!

Answers

When Lincoln became president, he had had no intention of abolishing slavery. Though he personally despised slavery, and had won the presidency on an anti-slavery platform, he would gladly have given up any chance of ending slavery in the South if it meant that the Confederate states would rejoin the United States. In Lincoln's first inaugural address in 1861, he told the Confederates that "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."With no hope of bringing the South back into the United States by protecting slavery, Lincoln had a new dilemma. His own political party, the Republicans, had formed around their opposition to slavery. Many of the more radical politicians in the party saw the secession of the South as the best opportunity to abolish slavery once and for all.

Daniel Webster of Massachusetts was against slavery but he agreed to compromise on the issue. Why?

Answers

The main reason why Daniel Webster of Massachusetts was against slavery but he agreed to compromise on the issue was because he understand that without compromise nothing would get done.

Daniel Webster was an American statesman who represented New Hampshire and Massachusetts in Congress. Webster contributed to the passage of the Compromise of 1850 which helped to appease a 4-year confrontation between slave and free states. Although he was opposed to numerous pro-slave policies the southern states proposed, he concluded that a full agreement between both sides was improbable and decided to accept some pro-slavery terms, such as Fugitive Slave provision in order to reach a compromise.

In Erik’s country, lawmakers have passed a new bill that allows elected members of the legislature to avoid testifying in trials if they declare that their testimony could damage national security or interests. This situation is best described by which of the following selections

Answers

The correct answer is erosion of the rule of law

The concept of the rule of law is related to the power of the state. It is when this power, in relation to the decisions that can be taken by the government, is limited by the set of laws, by the law.

In the rule of law, all fundamental human rights must be protected by the State: both political, social and economic rights.

The law, through legislation, will define what can or cannot be done, both in relation to government officials and in relation to citizens. In the rule of law a decision cannot be contrary to the law, that is, the law cannot be violated.

Answer:

erosion of the rule of law

Explanation:

I got it right.

On the next 10 questions, choose the correct amendment to go with its definition. Soldiers cannot take or live in a person's house3rd
4th
9th
6th

Answers

Answer:

3rd

Explanation:

it is amendment 3, under the topic of Quartering soldiers.

3rd.

I don’t really have a full explanation but it reads, “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law”