No. You have appropriately answered this question. You can cutoff some unwanted points if you think it might be too much, but according to me it is perfect. They are relevant because you have used the statistics wherever it is needed and the information from reliable resources. You can use it even for studying for your exams. As well, I have noted another point that you have used advanced vocabulary for this. The text has beautifully covered all the points needed for, as an answer.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU!!!!
ALL THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Both poems are about the power of imagination.
B.
Both poems are about natural phenomena.
C.
Both poems contain many Biblical allusions.
D.
Both poems are about morning time.
I only read "I'll Tell You How the Sun Rose" so I don't know the answer :( plz help is appreciated
Answer:
The option that best guys the question above is "B"
Both poems are about natural phenomena.
Explanation:
Both poems are about natural phenomena.
Even though imaginary language was used nature more talked about in both.
natural phenomenon are all phenomena that are not artificial are not in any engineered event manufactured by humans, although it may affect them.
B) It allows the reader to witness and understand Jamal's experience of his day as a junior representative.
C) It allows the reader to see and feel the pride that Jamal's mother felt when he won the contest with his letter.
D) It allows us to learn about the way that government is structured in detail and what responsibilities representatives actually have.
Here is the Passage...
Jamal wrote an essay because he really loved the government and knew that one day he wanted a career in the US Congress. Although he put his whole heart and soul into his letter, he had no idea that his essay would win the entire national contest! He wasn’t the only winner. Forty-nine other kids across America had also won the chance to visit Washington, DC, for the eighth annual Constitution Conference.
2On the trip, Jamal’s official title was “Junior Representative.” The kids who got to visit the nation’s capital had a very big day in store. The goal of the day was to teach kids the fundamentals of civil service. The organizers had planned a whole day of activities designed to help kids get an idea of how it would be to work in the different branches of government.
3First, all of the kids gathered in a large room made to look like the House floor. There, Jamal and the other winners said the Pledge of Allegiance and learned about the history of the Pledge. Several speakers went to the front of the room and made announcements. Then all of the kids watched and listened as the speakers debated. Some kids, who thought the day would be less educational, said the debate was monotonous. Jamal, however, enjoyed this exchange of words mostly because one day he wanted to be a great debater. To him, this was one of the best moments of the day.
Another fine show was when several new Americans reenacted their Pledge for Citizenship. Seeing how sincere those people were as they spoke made Jamal realize how lucky he was to be born in the United States.
The effect that the third-person-limited point of view has on the reader's understanding of this story is it allows the reader to see and feel the pride that Jamal's mother felt when he won the contest with his letter. The correct option is c.
The third-person limited point of view may be characterized as one of the literary devices the author frequently uses to enable the reader to comprehend both the scenes and the characters employed in the work on a deep level.
Regarding this query, it is clear that the author aids the reader in comprehending how Jamal functions as both a junior and a representation, which suggests that it aids the reader in gaining a thorough grasp of the character employed.
Thus, the correct option is c.
To learn more about the point of view, refer to the below link:
#SPJ5