The answer is E: What did you say about my work.
I put in what when I did this sentence for English and my teacher said it was correct.
I hope this helped! :)
Answer:
what are the options for the answers
Explanation:
b. Describing people and writing conversation
c. Doing research and organizing your ideas
d. Using the Internet and the on-line catalog
~voice.
~theme.
~mood.
2. read the following excerpt from "five hours to simla."
then, miraculously, out of the pelt of yellow fur that was the dust growing across the great northern indian plain, a wavering grey line emerged. it might have been a cloud bank looming, but it was not--the sun blazed, the earth shrivelled, the heat burnt away every trace of spring's beneficence. yet the grey darkened, turned bluish, took on substance.
"look --mountains!"
The correct answer to the first question is "Mood". It refers to a general feeling or emotion that the reader feels while reading. When a person reads a passage the mood is the response towards that passage.
For question number 2, the answer is the word "Enthralled" which is the word that best fits the mood of the excerpt. This word describes a fascination or an adventure that is enchanting or captivating.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have to do with what Hume didn't say. Therefore, it is false.
Kant's problem with Hume stems more from the fact that Kant believes what Hume didn't say to be incorrect. Kant and Hume did not always see eye to eye, but when they did, their debates focused mostly on the nature of knowledge and reasoning.
Kant was critical of both Hume's scepticism and his notion that knowledge is restricted to what can be perceived by our senses. Kant argued that knowledge extends beyond this. Kant maintained that there is such a thing as innate knowledge and that reason plays an important part in comprehending the universe.
#SPJ11
FALSE.
Kant's issue with Hume does not have more to do with what Hume didn't say. In fact, Kant's criticism of Hume's philosophy is primarily focused on what Hume did say. Kant disagreed with Hume's skeptical approach to knowledge and causality. Hume argued that knowledge is based solely on sensory experience and that causality is merely a habit of the mind. Kant, on the other hand, believed that knowledge is a combination of sensory experience and innate concepts of the mind. He argued that causality is a necessary condition for our understanding of the world.
Kant's critique of Hume centers around these fundamental differences in their philosophies. He sought to reconcile Hume's empiricism with his own rationalism, ultimately proposing a synthetic approach to knowledge that combined both empirical observation and a priori concepts. Thus, Kant's issue with Hume is not about what Hume didn't say, but rather about the fundamental disagreements in their respective theories of knowledge and causality.
False
Answer:
(B)false
Explanation:
details
They are all supporting details used to prove the author's claim or thesis correct. Examples of organizational structures would be chronological and cause and effect. Figurative language is the way an author amplifies his/her writing using techniques like metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, allusion, etc. Drama is the genre of literature that is written for the stage.