Answer:C- Interchangable
Explanation:
Answer: Slavs and Avars
In 550 CE, a group of barbarian invaders from eastern Europe named the Slavs began to raid the Balkan territory of the Byzantine Empire. To turn back these raids, the Byzantines arranged for another barbarian group, the Avars, to attack the Slavs.
These barbarian tribes were often at war with each other over territory and power. The Byzantines hoped to take advantage of this. The Avars lived in the Caucasus region and were related to the Huns. The Byzantines hoped that the Slavs would be too busy fighting the Avars to raid the Balkans. However, this plan backfired horribly.
Avars and Sassanids
Not only was the Byzantine army fighting the Avars mutiny, rebels in Constantinople also rioted and killed the emperor. Shortly afterwards, the new emperor was also killed by a competitor for the throne, Heraclius.
Arabs
After five years of peace, a new enemy threatened the empire. The Arabs managed to defeat Byzantine armies in Syria and Palestine, and after Heraclius died, they took control of Egypt.
Arab armies swept across Persia and Byzantine territories in North Africa and East Asia. They then turned their attention toward capturing Constantinople.
The Arabs attacked the city twice, in 674 CE and in 717 CE, and were defeated both times. The Byzantines were greatly aided by a weapon called Greek Fire. This weapon spewed fire at attacking ships, causing them to burst into flames.
Bulgars
In the early 600s, the Bulgar people united to form a powerful kingdom that stretched along the Danube in the Balkans. This group mixed with the Slavic people.
The Bulgarian Kingdom attacked the Byzantine Empire several times, which caused the Byzantine emperor to lead an army against them in 811 CE. The Bulgars crushed the Byzantine troops, killed the emperor, and two years later, attacked Constantinople.
increasing production.
- It allowed more private ownership of farms and
businesses, increasing production.
- It increased government control of the economy
decreasing production.
- It allowed more private ownership of farms and
businesses, decreasing production.
The New Economic Policy (NEP) was established in 1921. What was the effect of this policy change B. It allowed more private ownership of farms and businesses, increasing production.
Added through Vladimir Lenin in 1921, the new economic policy (or NEP) turned into a thorough shift in Bolshevik's financial strategy. It eased the harsh regulations of war communism, the Bolshevik financial policy for the duration of the Civil war, and allowed the return of markets and petty change.
Underneath the brand new coverage, the authority's objectives are to bridge social gaps in participation, get entry to, and get to know results in faculty schooling with a target of 100 percent Gross Enrolment Ratio (GEER) or zero school dropouts by means of 2030. The pinnacle 5 highlights of NEP 2020 are multiple entries and go-out options in diploma guides.
Learn more about New Economic Policy (NEP) at brainly.com/question/482932
#SPJ2
Answer:It allowed more private ownership of farms and businesses, increasing production. :)
Explanation:
Right on edge
Answer:
b . is right
Explanation:
B. Create parallelism by showing the opposing argument side-by-side
C. To create a simile by comparing arguments to each other
D. To build paid those by showing he feels bad for his opponents
The correct argument is A;
To build ethos by showing he understands the other side.
By showing that he understood the opposing argument, Thomas Paine demonstrated his great understanding of America under British rule. This allowed him to gain credibility, since he is well-versed and knowledgeable in many areas, not just when it comes to supporting his own argument.
Thomas Paine highlighted the opposing view of the colonies prospering under British rule to build ethos and strengthen his argument in his pamphlet 'Common Sense'. Therefore, option A is correct.
Thomas Paine, in his persuasive pamphlet 'Common Sense,' brings up the opposing argument that the colonies have prospered under British control with intention: He aims to build ethos by demonstrating his comprehensive understanding of the other side's viewpoint.
It's a rhetoric strategy often applied in persuasive writing; by acknowledging and then refuting an opposing viewpoint, the writer not only demonstrates a thorough understanding of the issue at hand, but also strengthens their own argument and credibility.
#SPJ11