Which statement best describes US involvement in the Korean Peninsula today?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: There are still U.S. troops in South Korea, so that means that the United States has not completely withdrawn. They are still present in Korea today. The United States sides with South Korea against the communists, as they oppose the traditional systems in place in United States society. Hopefully this helps.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

edgunity


Related Questions

The language of brazil is portuguese.trueorfalse
In the late 1700 which situation in dance is considered a cause of the other three
Which decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election resulted in a widely disputed election?to stop a vote recount in Florida to allow candidates the use of personal campaign funds to change the number of electoral votes required to win not to allow Florida's electoral votes to count
What was Hitler’s master plan for creating an Aryan racial empire?
How did Native American service in World War 1 impact their lives on the homefront

The civilizations of the Americas

Answers

Answer:Ancient America was home to sophisticated civilizations such as the Maya, Inca, Olmec and Aztec societies, and mysterious ruins like Chichen Itza, Teotihuacan, Serpent Mound, Tikal, Machu Picchu and the Nazca Lines.

Explanation:

Answer: Civilizations in the Americas were diverse and their peoples spoke many different languages.

Explanation: PF

What was President Nixon's policy involving the gradual withdrawal of American troops from South Vietnam? escalation
containment
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
Vietnamization

Answers

The correct answer to the question above is Vietnamization. It was President Nixon's policy, Vietnamization, that was involved in the gradual withdrawal of American troops from the South Vietnam and to end any involvement in the war. 

Answer:

Vietnamization

Explanation:

A historian publishes a paper on the ancient Greek leader Alexander the Great. However, most scholars reject his paper on the basis that the research is not reliable. Which factor could have led to this conclusion?A.) The historian chose a subject that was unpopular among other scholars.
B.) The paper credited too many sources by renowned historians.
C.) The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
D.) The historian taught history at a prestigious but small university.
E.) The historian regularly maintained personal historical blogs.

Answers

Out of all of the answers, the one that makes the most sense would be C. The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations. 

The fact that that historian's paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations was surely the factor that led his colleagues to deem the research that he conducted unreliable and, consequently, to reject his work.  

As experts and authorities in their respective field, historians must be objective and impartial and they must avoid positioning themselves or letting personal opinions influence their accounts of the past, since, by doing so, they run the risk of distorting the truth. Likewise, when using information from other authors or other sources, it is imperative that they cite them properly, in order to acknowledge them and grant their readers the chance to review them (if they wish to do so). Proper citations are the trademark of a professional, competent and trustworthy historian.        

Which part of French society was affected by the adoption of the Napoleonic Code?a. the schools
b. the banking system
c. the legal system
d. the military

Answers

The part of French society that was affected by the adoption of the Napoleonic Code is the legal system. Option C is correct.

The Napoleonic Code generated a great  influence on the world, since it was a modern legal code and it influenced several countries outside of Europe, although it was not the first modern legal code to ever be made. The Napoleonic Code forbade privileges according to birth, allowed freedom of religion, and was very specific in terms of government jobs which were provided just to those who were qualified for them.



Answer:

legal system

Explantaion:

took the quiz

What was one result of Russian leaders' resistance to change during the nineteenth century? Question 9 options: A. The tsar developed a different support system.
B. Russian serfs began overthrowing the rulers of their fiefdoms.
C. Russia struggled to modernize.
D. Russia maintained successful relations with long-time allies.

Answers

The correct option is D. Russia maintained successful relations with long-time allies.

result of Russian leaders' resistance to change during the nineteenth century

Russian leaders' opposition to change during the nineteenth century had one positive outcome: Russia was able to maintain fruitful ties with its long-standing friends. I'll also support "Russia battled with modernization." The solution should be beneficial.

Foreign relations of Russia

The government of Russia's foreign policy, which governs its dealings with other countries, their populations, and foreign organizations, is known as the Russian Federation's foreign relations. Since the Soviet Union's disintegration in late 1991, the Russian Federation's foreign policy has been the subject of this article.

Due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia and Ukraine currently have a critical diplomatic relationship.

The conflict between three opposing schools of thought can be seen in the Kremlin's discussions of foreign policy: the Atlanticists, who favor closer ties with the United States and the Western World in general; the Imperialists, who want to regain the semi-hegemonic status lost in the previous decade; and the Neo-Slavophiles, who advocate for the isolation of Russia within its own cultural sphere. Under Andrei Kozyrev, Atlanticism, which dominated throughout the early years of the new Russian Federation, came under fire for failing to uphold Russian dominance in the former USSR. A more nationalistic approach to foreign policy started after Yevgeny Primakov was appointed minister of foreign affairs in 1996.

From January 2000 to May 2008, and again from 2012 to the present, Vladimir Putin served as president. Russia has gotten involved in a number of noteworthy wars under Putin, including ones with its neighbors Georgia and Ukraine while also recognizing the independence of new republics inside those nations.

Between 2001 and 2022, relations with the United States in particular drastically worsened, and relations with the European Union significantly worsened since Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014.

The European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and other nations imposed significant economic and political sanctions against Russia as a result of its large-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The "Unfriendly Countries List" maintained by the Russian government lists the nations with which relations are currently tense (or nonexistent).

hence Russian leaders' opposition to change during the nineteenth century had one positive outcome: Russia was able to retain fruitful ties with its long-standing friends. I'll also support "Russia battled with modernization."

learn more about it:brainly.com/question/26173418

#SPJ2

Russia maintained successful relations with long-time allies, and struggled to modernize

which did Rousseau believe was better -a government freely formed by the people or one imposed on a people by force

Answers

Jean Jacques Rousseau was a philosopher and political writer during the period of Enlightenment and the French Revolution. The was very much inspired by his period and defended the idea of Social Contract, which is a system of government that is formed by the will of people, these people agree to give up certain rights to be protected by a government. Because of that Rousseau believed it was better a government formed freely by people because he believed in people sovereignty.

Rousseau believed a government should be freely formed unlike Hobbes during the Enlightenment.