Answer: I believe that the correct answer is that he has pride in his nation's people
Explanation:
In the excerpt, he describes his people as "great" and "peaceful". He is even fearful of letting them fight in war, illustrating his care and respect of his citizens.
If harnessed in an accurate way, this stuff could be a useful teaching tool, helping teachers facilitate student discussions and learning in a fun, easy manner.
If used right, this stuff could be an excellent teaching tool, helping teachers facilitate student discussions and learning in an easier, more relatable way.
If harnessed correctly, this technology will be a useful teaching tool, helping teachers facilitate student discussions and learning in an easier, more relatable manner.
If used correctly, this technology will be a great teaching tool, helping teachers facilitate student discussions and learning in a pretty fun, easy way.
A Neither require the viewer to interpret the setting to better understand the story’s context.
B Neither require the viewer to interpret the mood based on the lighting and sound effects used.
C Both require the viewer to visualize the action based on the stage directions in the drama’s script.
D Both require the viewer to infer characters’ emotions and motivations through the actors’ portrayals.
Answer:
"Both require the viewer to infer characters' emotions and motivations through the actors' portrayals."
Explanation:
With reading a play or story, you are able to differ everything based on what imagery goes on in your own mind. This is why more people like reading over watching or listening. Their voice and such are not set in stone. With stage acts and movies, everything that they do is set in stone, and nothing can be changed unless they redo the entire movie.
It is sarcasm that really suggests not setting the boat on fire. This is the correct option.
This may be said by a person who is criticising somebody else's idea. The chances of being seen by someone in a boat on fire are almost non-existent. If they are still alive , someone may still see them if they remain in the current situation: no fire on the boat. Yet, if they set fire on the boat, they will certainly sink and die. In case someone sees the fire, will they arrive on time to rescue them?
These options are not right:
-It is ironic that destroying the thing keeping them afloat may save them. ( The speaker thinks he / she will be able to remain in the boat before it sinks. The speaker does not make reference to being kept afloat).
-It is satire related to an entirely different set of circumstances. ( There is not enough information to infer which the other circumstances are).
--It is understated despair for the serious situation. ( The situation sounds serious but " understated despair" sounds contradictory. "Understated" means discrete)