Answer: The correct answer is : Both empires were an absolute monarchy. The social structures were very similar, they had a caste system where they classified civilians into 5 main classes, from greater to lesser power they were: brahmin, kshatriya, vaisya, sudra and untouchables. Both empires had weak rulers who could not sustain a large empire.
Comparing and Contrasting: Location, Social Structure, Religion, and Government. The Gupta Empire inherited the Mauryan land which was located in modern day India. The main difference between these two empires is that the Gupta Empire had a less extensive area.
to help women get factory jobs
to reduce work stoppages
to improve their working conditions
To improve their working conditions this is to some workers organize unions. Thus, option (d) is correct.
Workers formed unions for a variety of reasons, such as to enhance their working conditions, bargain for better pay and benefits, close wage gaps for minorities and women, have a voice in the workplace, solve issues more successfully as a group, and ensure job security and benefits.
Workers who are membersof unions receive higher earnings and benefits than non-members of unions, and unions assist lift people out of poverty and into the middle class. Additionally, unions contribute to safer workplaces by using collective action to strengthen the workplace's safety culture.
As a result, the significance of the workers organize unions are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on working conditions, here
#SPJ6
Answer:
to improve their working conditions
Explanation:
In 1800s workers organised unions to solve their basic problems. their problems are low wages and u safe working conditions
supporting a candidate is considered free speech.
the Constitution limits the influence of citizens on elections.
limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.
restrictions allow for greater influence by fewer corporations.
limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.
Campaign contributions in large amounts can influence the direction of an elected official and can be seen as interfering with the democratic process.
Historically, campaigns were inexpensive and until campaigning became more expensive little money was needed to win an elected seat. Today with the competitive nature of campaigning, more financing has been required and used. Large interest groups and wealthy individuals have donated large amounts of money to candidates. The Koch brothers for example have been cited as donating too much and offer an example for those in favor of restrictions.
limitations help to ensure the wealthy are less influential.