Answer:
its is just how it work
Explanation:
They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.
B.
They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.
C.
They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.
D.
They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.
The difference between Darwin and Lamarck is They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. Thus the correct option is B.
According to Darwin's theory, all organisms have a shared history, new species evolve from older ones, and species can change over time. Darwin concurred that parents' attributes were passed down to their children.
According to Lamarck's hypothesis, organisms would have worked hard to acquire the characteristic and passed it on to their children if they needed it to thrive in their surroundings.
How a creature acquired a certain property and passed it on is one of the fundamental differences between Lamarck's evolutionary theory and Darwin's theory of evolution.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about Darwin's Theory, here:
#SPJ2
How does the use of thetorical questions contribute to the effectiveness of this argument?
A. It forces the readers to decide for themselves between money and
B. It prompts the readers to answer question that require research.
C. It uses repetition to emphasize the amount of money the city will
D. It plays on the sound of words such as children in order to be safety save memorable.
Thanks
Answer:
A. It forces the readers to decide for themselves between money and children
Explanation:
Rhetorical question’s purpose is to persuade or ingeniously exert influence in the audience. On the other hand, rhetorical questions are not intended to be answered per se. In the case of this argument, the correct option is (A. It forces the readers to decide for themselves between money and children).
For instance the first rhetorical question “Do we want to risk our children’s health for the sake of few thousand dollars?” appeals to the awareness related to children’s protection and how dangerous ComCorp cell tower might be if it is built close to the school. On the other hand, the rhetorical question,”Aren't our children worth more than that?” implies that children are far more important than money and in both cases the reader is exposed to make a moral decision.
Answer: B. It prompts the readers to answer question that require research
Solution finder fits perfectly