A.the Know-Nothing Party
B.the Free-Soil Party
C.the Democratic Party
D.the Republican Party
Roe v. Wade
Gideon v. Wainright
Tinker v. Des Moines
Mapp v. Ohio
I believe the answer is: Mapp v Ohio
Mapp v Ohio was considered to be a landmark case in which united states court ruled out that the agents of justice departments are banned to conduct "unreasonable search and seizures". This make polices unable to search a private property without a warrant unless they hear a scream, cry for help or gun shot.
A Supreme Court case founded that it was unauthorized to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant is Mapp v. Ohio. Furthermore, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a breakthrough case in criminal process, in which the United States Supreme Court determined that evidence gained in abuse of the Fourth Amendment which defends opposed to "unreasonable seizures and searches," cannot be operated in state courts, state law criminal trials, and federal criminal law trials in federal courts as had previously been the law.
EXPLANATION:
The Supreme Court completed this by usage of a popular standard as selective integration; in Mapp this included the integration of the necessities, as construed by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is related only to acts of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment expected process clause which is related to acts of the states.
Particular investigations don't need a search warrant. For example,
• Consent: a permit is not needed when an individual in control of the property or object gives consent for the investigation.
• Hot chase of a criminal (to avert a criminal’s escape or aptitude to harm others);
• Forthcoming demolition of proof: where evidence might be demolished before an investigation can be properly gained;
• Emergency investigations: such as where there is somebody is heard yelling for help inside a residence; or
• Investigation incident to capture (to alleviate the risk of damage to the seizing officers specifically).
• Public safety: a warrantless investigation may be allowable in an emergency condition where the public is in a risky situation.
• Plain view: the proof is in the basic view of law enforcement officials, from a legal vantage point (with similar exclusions that involve basic smell, where the officer notices a scent that shows the occurrence of criminal activity or contraband).
In the case of a plain view, the official is legally on the assertions, his surveillance is from a lawful vantage point, and it is instantly obvious that the proof is contraband. The plain view rule implements, for instance, when the official has dragged the accused for a seat belt defilement and ensures a syringe on the seat of the passenger.
LEARN MORE
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? brainly.com/question/2507015
KEYWORDS : unreasonable searches and seizures, Mapp v. Ohio
Subject : History
Class : 10-12
Sub-Chapter : American Law History
National Bank
government to be paid without using income taxes
excise taxes
trade with warring nations
the issuance of government bonds
Answer:
The correct answers are"that states assume the debts of Federal government", "excise taxes" and "the issuance of government bonds".
Explanation:
The importance of Alexander Hamilton is noted by his inclusion in the $10 dollar bill, becoming the only person to be on currency without had being a president. Hamilton's financial program is among his greatest contributions to U.S., which included: the states assuming the debts of Federal government as a way to retire old depreciated obligations and borrowing new money at low interest rate; excise taxes in resources such as whiskey; and the issuance of government bonds, looking for revenues such as establishing a new tariff on imports.
Alexander Hamilton's suggestions in his financial program included assuming the debts of the Federal government, establishing a National Bank, and imposing excise taxes.
Three of Alexander Hamilton's suggestions in his financial program were:
#SPJ6
O leading armles on crusades to oust Muslims and Jews from Southern Europe
O defending the pope against Protestant criticisms
O starting a revolt against the Catholic Church in what is now the Czech Republic based on his criticisms of church practices
Answer:
started a revolt against the Christian church
The correct answer is A) The Byzantine emperor requested help from the pope. C) Muslims, Christians, and Jews wanted to protect, defend, and control the Holy Land.
The statements that describe an event or belief that led to the Crusades are the following: The Byzantine emperor requested help from the pope and Muslims, Christians, and Jews wanted to protect, defend, and control the Holy Land.
Both Christians and Muslims wanted to control the holy land of Jerusalem. This derived in the Crusades War. Eight major crusades confrontation happened from 1096 to 1291. The Middle Ages were times of conflict and wars. The Muslims had attacked Byzantine Empire territories and fouth to secure the control of its sacred sites. So Byzantium had to ask help to other Western European nations to fight the powerful Muslim army.