Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Illegal hunting and fishing practices are still accurring globally.
In spite of the worldwide laws that try to stop activities that harms the environment and the species that inhabit it, it´s almost impossible to stop some actions that the same humans carry out in order to benefit individually, within which are the illegal hunting oh animals and fishing.
Answer :It is the east, and Juliet is the sun. Arise, fair sun, and kill the envious moon, Who is already sick and pale with grief, That thou her maid art far more fair than she: Be not her maid, since she is envious; Her vestal livery is but sick and green And none but fools do wear it; cast it off.
Explanation:
The public believed that unions supported radical ideals, hence option (c) is the proper response.
Most individuals believed that unions were exclusively concerned with furthering the civil rights of black people. Because most people believed that unions were exclusively concerned with increasing blacks' civil rights, the public first feared them.
The necessity to defend the shared interests of workers gave rise to the labor movement in the US. Organized labor organizations pushed for greater pay, more lenient hours, and safer working conditions for people in the industrial sector.
In order to assist workers with issues relating to the workplace, such as poor pay, unsafe or unhygienic working conditions, long hours, and other situations, labor unions were established. Because of their union membership, employees frequently experienced issues with their employers.
Due to US manufacturing companies moving their operations to low-wage countries like China while laying off US union workers, there has been a fall in union membership over the previous three decades.
Learn more about the labor movement: brainly.com/question/21263631
#SPJ2
Stare decisis is the legal term given to the act of deciding cases according to past precedents. This concept, which underpins the common law system, promotes the reliance on past legal rulings when interpreting laws for current cases. However, it does allow for flexibility and the creation of new precedents.
The legal term for deciding cases according to past precedents is known as stare decisis. This principle, utilized within the U.S. common law system, essentially promotes adherence to precedents set by past legal interpretations and rulings. The court interprets written laws, utilizing established precedents to properly apply the laws to the occurrences in the present case.
Stare decisis ensures a level of consistency and stability within the legal system, contributing to a sense of legitimacy and fairness. In essence, past rulings serve as a guide, setting the direction for the adjudication of new cases. It's important to note that while stare decisis fosters an adherence to precedent, it does not entirely inhibit flexibility or the creation of new precedents.
Lastly, findings in one legal case, under the principle of stare decisis, can strongly influence and dictate the outcome of another legal case, granted the legal facts are similar.
#SPJ2
Answer:
Stare decisis is the answer
Answer:
C would be correct
Explanation:
They produce only enough to feed theri family and they have little left over to sell at a market