the Nile River
Ice Ages
overpopulation of the region
-race
-religion
-politics
Ethnicity represents the common characteristics of an ethnic group, such as language, culture, tradition, religion, which determines the identity of a person or group. From this it follows that ethnicity does not necessarily mean genetic, because some of the characteristics of ethnicity can be changed through generations, such as religion, culture and even language to a certain extent. Ethnicity can highlight the differences between two or more ethnic groups, although it is the same race. Nevertheless, in a wider sense, the race is one of the characteristics of ethnicity. Politics is a social category, created under specific socio-economic conditions and as such is often variable, so it has nothing to do with ethnicity, what more within a single ethnic group can be more political options.
Politics is not a characteristic of ethnicity.
Among the options given, politics is not a characteristic of ethnicity. Ethnicity typically includes elements like language, religion, and race. Although politics may be influenced by one's ethnicity, it is not a defining feature.
The characteristic that does not fit in the context of ethnicity is politics. Ethnicity generally refers to a group of people who identify with each other due to common ancestral, social, cultural, or national experiences. This often includes shared characteristics such as language, religion, and race, along with other societal factors. However, political beliefs or affiliations, while they can be influenced by one's ethnic background, are not considered a defining feature of ethnicity.
#SPJ6
C) the extent to which the seperation of powers was allowed
D) wheatherlaws had been broken during the watergate incident
Answer:
C) the extent to which the separation of powers was allowed
Explanation:
The United States v. Nixon was a case in which Richard Nixon (The President at the time) was accused of being involved in the Watergate Scandal (1972). In the Court, the Supreme Court ordered him to deliver the unedited tape recordings and documents related to such event. However, Nixon refused to do so, claiming his "Executive Privilege", that is to say, his right as President to withhold information from other government branches to preserve confidential communications within the executive branch or to secure the national interest.
The constitutional issue at the heart of the case was the extent or scope of the powers of the executive and the judicial. Did the President have the power to withhold information and not show it to the other branches, and until what point? And did the Judicial have the power to order him to deliver such "confidential" documents?
At the end of the case, the result did not favor the President as the Court determined that the executive privilege had limits and it wasn't immune from judicial review, regarding the demands of due process of law, and he had to show the evidence.
b. Medina
c. Muslim
d. Mecca
e. Kaaba
is it e?