Answer:
rx3rerwrtrfasdfdfadfadfadfdfqer
Explanation:
werwer
The question relates to a comparative study in social sciences about the differences in cognition (information processing, synthesizing, and inference drawing) among Korean students, Korean Americans, and European Americans. It might have been aimed at understanding the influence of culture on thought processes.
The question pertains to a study comparing Korean students in Seoul, Korean Americans, and U.S.-born European Americans. The study aimed to infer how each group thinks and synthesizes information when presented with a complex, hypothetical situation, such as determining why a graduate student might have killed a professor.
Such a study resembles the work of Jenkins et al. (2012) and Frances Heussenstamm (1971), both of whom used surveys and experiments to understand attitudes, behaviors, and prejudices among different ethnic and social groups.
This type of research draws heavily on concepts from Social Psychology and Sociology to understand culturally rooted cognitive processes. The objective of the original study can be compared to Masuda & Nisbett's work (2001), which examined differences in how Japanese and Americans attend to information holistically versus analytically.
#SPJ3
B. an act establishing United States foreign policy
C. an act that gave the president the right to deport aliens
D. an act guaranteeing freedom of speech
strong federal government
selective equality
popular sovereignty
The correct answer is:
d. popular sovereignty
Explanation:
Popular sovereignty, or sovereignty of the peoples' rule, is the policy that the executive of a state and its government is designed and maintained by the approval of its people, through their elected legislators, who are the source of all political power.
The two questions you should ask while reflecting on your solution:
It goes without saying that you want to arrive at the right conclusion and complete what you've begun while conducting an experiment or whenever you're attempting to solve a problem. If your proposed solution didn't work, it was the incorrect one, and you must start over and come up with a better one.
Even if your solution was sound, you would still want to know how you went about coming up with it. On the other side, you need to know what went wrong and why you arrived at the incorrect answer or solution so that you may repeat the experiment and adjust the incorrect variable to get at the right answer.
Learn more about the solution, here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation: