Answer: The Share the wealth used by Huey Long was used in critizing the New Deal. His main point was that state wealth should be shared among the poor and the rich
Explanation:
Huey Long who was a governor in Louisiana and later became a Senator in 1932. He was known for the phrase " SHARE OUR WEALTH" he used in the defense against President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the era of NEW DEAL.
However, Long assertion was based mainly on the redistribution of wealth among the poor and the rich. He canvasses that the rich one should pay more tax. He proposed that the wealth of the rich with over $3million should be taking over and giving to the less previleged ones with a wealth of $5,000. He also states that the federal government was having a too cordial relationship with the high and mighty in the society and as a result neglecting the working class in the society.
Long thinking was that the government should tax the rich use the money to provide accommodation, cars for the people. Long was however killed in 1936.
The other critique of the New Deal was also the American liberty league Francis, father Charles Coughlin and Francis Townsend.
The main causes of the Russia Revolution of 1917 were the poverty of the peasant class, the rise of the urban industrial class, the antiquated and oppressed military , a growing intellectual movement , and the inefficiency and autocracy of the Tsarist regime.
I hope that's help !
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was caused by a combination of factors. Socioeconomic inequality, exacerbated by World War I, created widespread discontent among the population.
The autocratic rule of Tsar Nicholas II and limited political freedoms further fueled the dissatisfaction.
An agricultural crisis and the influence of revolutionary ideas provided a fertile ground for opposition movements to mobilize.
The culmination of these factors led to the outbreak of the revolution, marking a significant turning point in Russian history.
Read more on Russian Revolution here brainly.com/question/810738
#SPJ6
2.Independent Mexican states gained more power and control.
3.Texas was taken over by Mexico and became part of that country.
4.Texas revolted and declared independence from Mexico.
I believe the answer is: 4.Texas revolted and declared independence from Mexico.
In the 1830s, the influx of settlers that come into the Texas territory started to change the majority population in Texas. (prior to 1800s, Mexicans arethe majority population). After that, the settlers believe that they would be better of if they replace the mexican government with their own, which lead to the Texas revolution.
How many states have two intermediate appellate courts?- the answer is 10
B: alternating hot and cold climates
C: hot, dry climates
D: warm, humid climates
Answer:
3 years late but oh well!
Explanation:
Naturalized citizen is the correct option.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This statement contrasts with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age in that President Woodrow Wilson had a totally different approach to guarantee fair competition between businesses and industries in the United States. He believed that the role of the government was to create the proper conditions and legislation that allowed all of the American citizens to grow, prosper, and thrive, having no preferences in the application of the law.
Let's have in mind that during the Gilded Age, the Robber-Barons created multi-millionary industries that eliminated the competition and formed monopolies, as was the case of the Standard Oil company of John F. Rockefeller or the Steel company of Andrew Carnegie.
Wilson's assertion is at odds with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age because he advocated for government intervention to ensure fair interaction between individuals and trusts, whereas laissez-faire proposed minimal government interference.
Wilson's statement contrasts significantly with the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age, which believed in minimum government intervention in the economy. Wilson argued that the government had a responsibility to intervene and protect individuals from the power of the trusts, large corporate entities that were prevalent during this time.
This underscores a key difference between laissez-faire capitalists who believe in unrestricted competition and minimal restrictions, and those who, like Wilson, argue for government regulation to achieve fair play and equality. This is a fundamental debate within economics and political theory that has persisted into the modern day.
#SPJ11