The correct answer is Kepler
The concept that planets move in elliptical orbits was established by Johannes Kepler in his First Law of Planetary Motion. This significant idea disrupted the earlier belief of circular orbits and brought tremendous knowledge in our solar system understanding.
The fact that the orbits of planets are elliptical was part of the planetary laws developed by the renowned astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler. Damaging the former belief of circular orbits, Kepler, based on detailed and exhaustive astronomic observations, established his First Law of Planetary Motion which stated that planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun at one of the two foci. This was a significant breakthrough in understanding our solar system and continues to be fundamental in physics and astronomy today.
#SPJ2
b. GPS satellite system
c. Richter scale
d. Mercalli Scale
Answer:
A. Is the correct answer. I just took the test.
Explanation:
Answer:
3.2 and 428.8 are the two numbers
Explanation:
x + 134x = 436
135x = 436
x = 436/135
x = 3.2
First number = x = 3.2
Second number = 134x = 134 * 3.2 = 428.8
Answer:
Explanation:
The moment of inertia is the integral of the product of the squared distance by the mass differential. Is the mass equivalent in the rotational motion
a) True. When the moment of inertia is increased, more force is needed to reach acceleration, so it is more difficult to change the angular velocity that depends proportionally on the acceleration
b) True. The moment of inertia is part of the kinetic energy, which is composed of a linear and an angular part. Therefore, when applying the energy conservation theorem, the potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy, the rotational part increases with the moment of inertia, so there is less energy left for the linear part and consequently it falls slower
c) True. The moment of inertial proportional to the angular acceleration, when the acceleration decreases as well. Therefore, a smaller force can achieve the value of acceleration and the change in angular velocity. Consequently, less force is needed is easier
d. The lower the moment of inertia, the slower something will roll down an incline - this is the option that is NOT true. Objects with lower moments of inertia roll down inclines faster, not slower because they resist changes to their rotation less.
The correct statement that is NOT true among the provided options is: d.
The correct statement that is NOT true among the provided options is: d. The lower the moment of inertia, the slower something will roll down an incline.
The moment of inertia, often denoted by 'I', is essentially the rotational equivalent of mass for linear motion. It is a property of a body that measures its resistance to angular acceleration, which is its change in angular velocity.
However, the claim in statement d is not correct as per the principles of rotational motion in physics. An object with a lower moment of inertia would actually roll down an incline faster, not slower, given the same amount of gravitational potential energy, since it has less resistance to changes in its rotational motion.
#SPJ3
Answer:
A. 45 degrees
Explanation:
A projectile travels the farthest when it is launched at an angle of 45 degrees.
The maximum range is 45 degrees, ignoring air resistance.
sin(2θ) = 1
∴ 2θ = π/2.
(2θ)/2 = (π/2)/2
θ = π/4
π/4 or 45°
Answer:
A. 45 degrees
Explanation:
Answer:
This means that the Lewis dot structure for C2H6 must account for 14 valence electrons, either through bonding between atoms, or through lone pairs. So, the two C atoms are placed in the center of the molecule.
Answer:Bohr placed the electrons in distinct energy levels. Rutherford described the atom as consisting of a tiny positive mass surrounded by a cloud of negative electrons. Bohr thought that electrons orbited the nucleus in quantised orbits.
Explanation: also rutherfords was just a hypothesis while Bhor took the time to make his an experiment