The given statement “Consumer as well as the merchant do pay the charges to the credit card company when transacted for the goods and services bought or sell” is true.
Answer: Option 1
Explanation:
Both the consumer and the merchant pay transaction charges to the company of the credit card for every transaction made in most of the cases.
There are some POS charges of about 2 percent which is to be paid solely by the merchant but they charge to the consumer which is fraudulent. Apart from that, merchant pays 1 to 4 percent of charges as commission charges.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It's a 50/50. I'm probably right
Answer:
The total answer is: A.
How much of the Bill of Rights applies to the states. Full Incorporation: The theory that the due process clause of Amendment 14 requires states to defend all freedoms in the Bill of Rights; rejected by the supreme court in favor of selective incorporation. Selective Incorporation: The process by which, over time, the Supreme Court applied to states those freedoms that served some fundamental principle of freedom or justice, thus rejecting full incorporation
:)
Answer:
"A plea bargain is defined as an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the defendant where the prosecutor convinces the defendant to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with a recommendation of a lighter sentence. A plea bargain allows the defendant to skip the lengthy process of a court trial and to avoid being convicted of the possible stronger charge. There are three types of plea bargaining available to defendants today.
The three forms of plea bargaining are:
Charge Bargaining: This is used when a defendant pleads guilty to a less serious crime than the one originally imposed
Count Bargaining: This is used when the defendant pleads guilty to a fewer number of the charges.
Sentence Bargaining: This is used when the defendant pleads guilty knowing what sentence will be given."
Explanation:
True
OB. False
Answer:
The answer is False
Explanation:
Without context, it's hard to definitively state if 'Lanza' displayed the principle of early onset, which refers to psychological issues manifesting early in life. In cases such as Adam Lanza, retrospective analysis suggests potential early-onset mental health issues, but such claim should be made cautiously.
The question asks if Lanza can be considered as having displayed the principle of early onset. This refers to the idea that behavioral or psychological issues manifest early in a person's life, often during childhood or adolescence. Without specific context, it is hard to definitively say whether Lanza displayed this principle. For instance, if we're referring to Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting, multiple sources suggest he exhibited signs of mental health issues from a young age, which could be taken as an example of early-onset. However, it's important to note that such conclusions should be drawn cautiously, as they are often based on retrospective analysis and not direct clinical assessment.
#SPJ2
Answer:
The answer would be the Federal Court.
Explanation:
This is because the Federal Court covers the whole united states, and the State Court only covers a specific state.
I hope this helped!
Answer:
A
Explanation: