(b) The Himalayas
(c) The Andes Mountains
(d) The Rocky Mountains
(e) None of the above
Answer: b) The Himalayas
Explanation: A collision between the Indo-Australian plate and the Eurosian plate led to the formation of the Himalayas. The present structure was formated by several steps, the first step was the collision of the Gondwana plate and Angara plate where the sea bed rose into longitudinal ridges and valleys, in the second collision step the Tethys bed rose greatly causing the final retreat of sea, forming the Great Himalayas and the Tibetan retreat of the sea. The third step was the formation of the lower Himalayas followed by the fourth step where the Himalayas ranges were elevated and the Sub Himalayas were raised. This last step led to the current structure of the Himalayas.
b. campfire
c.lightning
d.burning garbage
Answer: (C) Lightning
Explanation:
Lightning is one of the natural causes of the wildfire as the lightning is the naturally caused wildfire. Natural flames are by and large begun by lightning, with a very little rate began by sudden ignition of dry fuel for example leaves and the sawdust.
The average 22,600 wildfire are mainly occurred due to the lightning per year. On the other hand, all the other options are incorrect as they all are the human caused wildfire.
Therefore, Option (C) is correct.
b. northern Europe
c. eastern Europe
d. Russia
The answer is A) Western central Europe i took the test and got it correct
Stars appear to rise and set due to Earth's rotation, which happens from west to east. This makes all observable stars seem to rise in the east and set in the west, making it unlikely to find a star that behaves otherwise. Therefore, the correct option is option c.
The best explanation for the scenario where a star rises in the west and sets in the east is option c) This statement does not make sense. The stars appear to rise and set because of Earth's rotation. This perceived motion of the stars is due to our planet's daily rotation on its axis, not the stars themselves moving.
This rotation happens from the west towards the east, which causes stars to appear to rise from the east and set in the west. This pattern remains consistent for all observable stars from Earth. Therefore, it's not feasible to find a star that behaves contrary to this mechanism under general conditions.
Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: "Although all the known stars rise in the east and set in the west, we might someday discover a star that will rise in the west and set in the east." Choose the correct explanation why does the statement above make sense (or is clearly true) or does not make sense (or is clearly false).
a) This statement does not make sense. The stars moves because of the Galaxy's rotation around it center. So, during the day, al the stars must move in the same direction.
b) This statement makes sense. The North Star itself does not appear to move usually, but sometimes the precession occurs. Precession changes the tilt of Earth's axis and could make the North star set in east or rise in west.
c) This statement does not make sense. The stars appear to rise and set because of Earth's rotation. So, during the day, all the stars must move in the same direction.
d) This statement makes sense. The star appear to rise and set because of the sum of Earth's rotation and changing the seasons. So, in the night of solstice, the North Star could move in the opposite direction to other stars.
Learn more about Earth's Rotation here:
#SPJ11
b. cold
c. stationary
d. warm