B. A case where a caterer refuses to enter a condemned building to provide food to a Halloween party.
C. A case where a liquidated (pre-determined) damages payment in a contract was excessively disproportionate to the injury.
D. A case where an employer was sued for forcing employees to work in unsafe conditions.
Answer:
B. A case where a caterer refuses to enter a condemned building to provide food to a Halloween party.
Explanation:
The doctrine of legal precedent (stare decisis) is used in most common law systems as a way to provide stability and predictability to legal decisions. Under this doctrine, a legal case can set a "precedent" that creates a principle or a rule. This rule is then used in future cases that significantly resemble the previous one in terms of context and facts.
Answer:
d. A case where a liquidated (pre-determined) damages payment in a contract was excessively disproportionate to the injury.
Explanation:
Law student
B You must use the FAFSA to apply for the federal work-study program.
C You cannot fill out the FAFSA form without your parent/guardian.
D You should only fill out the FAFSA form if you can demonstrate financial need.
FAFSA stands for Free Application for Federal Student Aid. The student aid includes federal grants, loans and work-study funds .
The following statements about the FAFSA process is TRUE :
B. You must use the FAFSA to apply for the federal work-study program.
It is also important to note that the sooner the student applies, the better his/her chances of reviving generous aid, because a large portion of financial aid in the United States is distributed on a rolling basis
C) licensing
D) protectionism
Answer: Exporting.
Explanation:
PreFab is engaged in exportation of their clothing line from their country where it is produced to Irmana where it is used. Exportation is the process of sending products made in a country to another country where it is consumed. In exportation taxes are paid in the form of duties.
B. Time order
C. Process analysis
D. Classification
Hello darlings, The answer to this is Time order.
God bless you greatly :)
Answer:
Option C.The payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Rupert did the right thing and as well follow the due process and custom of the country because he fills out the license paperwork and as well takes the license paperwork to the correct office in which he pays the front desk person the amount of $100 to process the paperwork while Cordelia on the other hand violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act reason been that due to the connections she had in that country she went ahead to schedules an appointment with the minister in charge of commerce because the minister has the authority to determine the foreign companies that can get licenses and she as well pays the minister the amount of $200 to approve their license.
Therefore based on the scenario we can vividly say that the payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
A _______________________ parking space is set at an angle of 90 degrees to the curb. A. perpendicular B. parallel C. angled D. small