What does the word precipitated mean in the following sentence? The incident at the school precipitated the need for more security

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The word "precipitated" in this sentence means "brought about." To precipitate means to cause something, and in this case, the incident caused the school to hire greater security so as to prevent these things from happening. "Lessened" and "oppressed" are quite the opposite of what happened, whereas the incident happened before, not after more security was brought, which is why "happened after" is also incorrect.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

the answer is D) brought about for plato users

Took the test and got it rite!!

Hope this helps!!


Related Questions

How are the Roman Forum and the Globe Theatre similar? Both were built in Rome. Both were built in Elizabethan England. Both served as a stage for political and social issues of their time period. Both had audiences comprised only of people with great wealth and status.
How do verb tenses function in sentences?a. They clarify when an action occurs.b. They explain who is doing the action.c. They consist of nouns.d. They consist of adverbs. User: Building blocks __________ around for hundreds of years.Which of the following verbs correctly fills in the blank?a. hasb. havec. have beend. is being
If you follow language conventions, you will not have difficulties communicating.a. Trueb. False
What is the significance on the title "was it a dream"
Lucas likens the structure of the declaration of independence to a

Essay about the death penalty

Answers

The death penalty is also known as capital punishment and is probably one of the most emotive topics in any criminal justice system in the world today. Most countries in the world today have abolished the death penalty. There are a few countries such as the United States of America and Saudi Arabia, who still condone the practice of sentencing a criminal to death as punishment for a crime committed. In simple terms, it means to be put to death as punishment for crimes committed against society. Historically capital punishment was often carried out in public and was accompanied by torture.

Answer:

The Death Penalty should not be abolished. The death penalty has been successful for thousands of years. It is effective because it deters criminals from committing serious crimes, it is quick, painless and cost effective, it also appeases the victims’ families.

A jail term will not be a deterrent for those who have committed serious crimes. Mu*derers, kidn*ppers, ra*ists, or dr*g lords should know that if found guilty, they would be given the death penalty. This should make them think twice before committing brutal acts of crime. Some countries and states that have abolished the death penalty were forced to revert back to the lethal punishment when they couldn’t keep the rising crime rates under control. States like Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Arizona, California, Utah and Washington still send hardcore criminals to die, by gas inhalation, lethal injection or hanging. Criminals know that committing serious crimes can lead to the death penalty. If they still dare commit such crimes, then they should be held responsible and made to face the law. When the innocent become victims of horrendous crimes, it’s only fair that the criminals are not let off the hook.

Furthermore, It is true that even with the threat of the death penalty, violent crimes are committed with exemption. Dr*g traffickers and pushers operate freely; and the threat of gang fights, r*pe, m*rder, armed robbery and kidn*pping under the influence of drugs as well as dr*g-related disputes are ever present. But what more of the country abolishes the death penalty?

H*ll will break loose, and more criminals will dare to commit serious crimes. There will also be a free flow of dr*gs that will destroy social order. The opinion that even the death penalty has not deterred criminals from committing serious crimes cannot be an excuse to get rid of said law.

Next, the thought to abolish the death penalty has to be carefully studied. The death penalty is still needed when a country is littered with crimes that can create fear in criminals, as well as hope in citizens. Humanitarians, practicing lawyers, and others who push for abolishing capital punishment should not be so concerned about about the lives of m*rderers, r*pists, kiddn*ppers, and dr*g traffickers, and ignore the countless numbers of violent deaths of victims who were innocent caused by these criminals. Without the death penalty it could give criminals the wrong idea, such as disgusting and disturbing crimes not being taken seriously with punishment. The repeal of the death penalty treats all murders as the same. Once a person commits a single act of murder, each additional murder is a freebie.

On the other hand, some would say the death penalty is r*cist, inhumane, and outright wrong. But, crime has nothing to do with race, gender, sexulaity, etc. If you’re a bad person commiting crimes, that's just who they are. The death Penalty stops criminals from committing serious crimes. In no way should a person take or torture an innocent life, and not have any repercussion for what they did.

In conclusion, abolishing the death penalty will only send the wrong signal to those who have the tendency to commit horrible crimes. Sparing the lives of hardcore criminals for humanitarian reasons will only cause more misery for others. It will see a rise of serious crimes in our society, further impairing the nation.

Explanation:

you will have to go thru and get rid of the *, it wouldnt let me publish without the words blocked  

Write a brief dialogue that reflects how men generally prefer to communicate.

Answers

what i have noticed men prefer to talk about sports and how they want to chill some time. men like to sit around and normally do outside labor when they work. men are naturally dirtier than women and tend to make messes more frequently. they also tend to talk slower. they tend to also communicate with body movements.

To whom does Frodo offer the Ring first? A.
Gandalf

B.
Legolas

C.
Sam

D.
Galadriel
annnnd
What theme is represented by Aragorn?

A.
All good things must come to an end.

B.
Might makes right.

C.
You cannot judge a book by its cover.

D.
Love conquers all.

Answers

Firstly, Frodo offers the ring to Gandalf, for he is of it's power and does not think he can be trusted with it. Gandalf realizes that if he had the ring, he would've been corrupted by it, and as such refuses.
The ring is never offered to Legolas.
The ring is never offered to Sam, although he offers to carry it in some cases, and before Frodo was dragged to Cirith Ungol, Sam did take it off of him.
The ring is offered to Galadriel, but she declines for the same reasons as Gandalf.

Secondly, the main theme represented by Aragorn would be You cannot judge a book by its cover.
The other ones don't make too much sense.
Aragorn certainly did not believe in might makes right.
While Aragorn's love story was present in the book, it was far from his main theme, and Arwen rarely appeared.
And while the concept of All good things must come to an end is in the book, it is not represented by Aragorn. It is represented by the elves and their leaving from Middle Earth, Aragorn shows new birth with the kingdom of Men.
Hope this helps :)

Answer:

1)A

2)C

Explanation:

Frodo offered the ring to Gandalf in Bag end, then Galadriel. I don't know about the others though. But I'm sure Frodo never offered the ring to Boromir or Legolas.

Aragorn represents do not judge a book by its cover.

Either you must stop eating my food from the refrigerator or you must pay me for it. 8. What sort of conjunction is used in the sentence? A. Coordinating B. Common C. Subordinating D. Correlative

Answers

c i looked irt on gogol

Which type of protagonist is common to psychological suspense?

Answers

I believe the type of protagonist which is common to psychological suspense is a highly intelligent protagonist. 

The answer is B , highly intelligent .

Your new DVD player is not working. The power turns on, but the television screen remains blank. Which reference should you use?encyclopedia
repair manual
technical dictionary
user guide
This one seems easy but I just like to always have a second answer.

Answers

I believe you should use user guide because maybe such problems are listed in the guide for your DVD player. Since you probably aren't going to repair the machine on your own, there is no need for looking for the solution in the repair manual. 
Other Questions