Answer:
to direct action toward the verb’s object.
Explanation:
B)The show starts at 700 don't be late.
C)The show starts at 7:00, don't be late
D)The show starts at 700, don't be late
"He was just here a minute ago," Naomi spoke just above a whisper. She had looked all over the house for Sid in a state of panic. It was Naomi's first day as a baby sitter, and she really needed that job. More importantly, Sid was just a little boy.
"I thought he was too little to run away," Naomi talked to herself, as she often did while feeling stressed. "Where could he possibly be?" She tried to remember where she had seen Sid last. "Was it the living room or the drive way?" She remembered Sid's sad face as he watched his mother leave for work. He was hanging on to door of the coat hanger closet in the living room.
In a matter of moments, Naomi ran to the living room and opened the closet. There she found Sid curled up and fast asleep with his mother's scarf in his hands.
"Poor baby," Naomi said, planting a kiss on Sid's forehead. Feeling relieved, she lifted him and put him in the crib. For now, Naomi's job and the bicycle she wanted to buy were both secure.
How would the story be different if it were told from Sid's point of view?
A. It would describe the thoughts and feelings of each character in the story.
B. It would address the reader directly while narrating the events in the story.
C. It would show more about Sid's feelings when his mom leaves for work.
D. It would include the details of Naomi's previous experience as a babysitter.
B. delete.
C. defriend.
D. unsubscribe.
B. The meteorologist predicts snow for New Year's Eve, so it will snow New Year's Eve.
C. It snowed on New Year's Eve, so it will snow every New Year's Eve.
D. It has snowed every day this week, so it will likely snow tomorrow.
The meteorologist predicts snow for New Year's Eve, so it will snow New Year's Eve.
Further Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a kind of reasoning in which there is some kind of evidence provided before coming to any conclusion and inductive reasoning is just opposite to deductive reasoning. The conclusion of the ‘deductive argument’ is certain; the truth in order to the conclusion part of an argument which is indicative may be a probability and that is mostly based upon the evidence given.
In many dictionaries, Inductive reasoning is defined as the derivation of the general principals from the specific observations even if there are enough inductive arguments that do not have that form. Inductive reasoning allows for the possibility that a conclusion can be wrong and they can be wrong even if the premises are true. Inductive reasoning is either weak or strong and that depends on how possible the conclusion is true.
Learn More:
1. Why were taxes an ongoing source of conflict for the American colonists?
2. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. Is elected by representatives chosen by the people. Is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament? Is elected directly by the people.
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Inductive Reasoning
Subject: English
Keywords: Indicative reasoning, Evidence, Dictionaries, Premises, Conclusion, Possibly, Probability, Deductive reasoning.
Answer:
C.) It snowed on New Year's Eve, so it will snow every New Year's Eve
Explanation:
that's what was correct for me
The past perfect tense indicates that an action was completed at some point in the past before something else happened.
Subject+had+past participle=past perfect tense.
Therefore, the sentence that uses the past perfect tense is, "Carl had asked his mother's permission before he left town."