Positives of Political Machines are Social Services are: Infrastructure Development; Political Engagement; and Economic Opportunities.
Negatives of Political Machines are: Corruption; Lack of Accountability; Undemocratic Practices; and Exploitation and Patronage.
Political machines provided vital social services to communities, particularly to marginalized groups such as immigrants and the urban poor. They initiated public works projects, such as building roads, bridges, schools, parks, and hospitals.
Political machines were often characterized by corruption and bribery. Machine leaders held significant control over political processes, manipulating elections, and stifling opposition.
Learn more about political machine here:
#SPJ2
Explanation:
Political machines did many illegal things and broke rules to help their candidates win elections. Machine leaders like "Boss" Tweed also stole money from the city. But political machines did help keep the city running. They built parks, schools, roads, orphanages, and sewers that improved city life.
hope it helped you!!
group operating out of Afghanistan and Pakistan​
Answer:
heyoo!!!
Islam is the answer
have a wonderful day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
Answer: terrorist
Explanation: i took a quiz on this already
President Reagan supported B). FEDERAL economic tax proposals. The reason why President Reagan supported Federal economic tax proposals was because those taxes for federal reasoning would help out the economy, and would better the United States in his thoughts. With the federal taxes, the U.S could do a lot with it, and use it to benefit the U.S in many ways.
President Reagan supported federal economics tax proposals. Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States, who served from 1981 to 1989, is referred regarded as the father of Reaganomics. Thus, option B is correct.
His economic plans included deregulating domestic markets, reducing social expenditure, raising military spending, and broadly cutting taxes. In response to a protracted period of economic stagflation that started under President Gerald Ford in 1976, several initiatives were implemented.
The trickle-down hypothesis and supply-side economics had an impact on Reaganomics. Marginal tax rates dropped, tax receipts rose, inflation slowed, and the unemployment rate dropped under the presidency of Ronald Reagan.
Therefore, option B is the ideal selection.
Learn more about Reaganomics here:
#SPJ6
Since the decision of the Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the decisions of the speaker. The scope would have been very large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not respected.
If a court decided in favor of Adam Clayton, an African-American politician, and civil rights leader, it could lead to significant implications in civil rights and social justice, prompting more equal rights legislation and promoting momentum in the civil rights movement.
To decipher the far-reaching results if the court decided in favor of Adam Clayton, it's important to consider the context and nature of the case. Adam Clayton was a prominent African-American politician and civil rights leader. Therefore, a court's decision in his favor might lead to significant implications in the area of civil rights and social justice. For instance, it may push for more equal rights legislation, encourage momentum in the civil rights movement, or implement policy changes that reduce racial disparities in society.
Additionally, the court's decision could create a ripple effect in society, leading to increased public awareness and discussion around the issue at hand. This can contribute to societal progress and potential changes in legislation or public policies.
#SPJ3
George W. Bush lost the popular vote but won the presidency.
B.
George W. Bush won the popular vote by a large margin and the electoral vote by a small margin.
C.
George W. Bush won the popular vote but lost the Electoral vote.
D.
George W. Bush won both the popular vote and the Electoral vote by large margins.
My answer is C am i correct say yes or no followed with the real answer :)
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In the 2000 presidential election, George W. Bush lost the popular vote but won the presidency.
Explanation:
The presidential election of 2000 was contested between the Democratic candidate Al Gore, at that time vice president, and the Republican candidate George W. Bush, then governor of Texas and son of former President George HW Bush (1989-1993). Bill Clinton, the outgoing president, vacated the position of president after having served a maximum of two periods allowed by the Twenty-Second Amendment. Bush won the hard-fought election on Tuesday, November 7, with 271 electoral votes against Gore's 266 (with one translucent vote abstained in the official recount). During the elections the controversy arose in who had won the 25 electoral votes of Florida (and, therefore, the Presidency), the process of recounting in that state, and that the losing candidate had received 543,895 popular votes more than the winner.
Answer:
wdym couldn't they become rich? their was a HUGE wage gap between white and blacks at the time, not to mention they made money off of the working slaves, plus what is becoming rich ganna do? If most of the white cops are racists, and your black if a white person is hitting you how are you meant to stand up without getting arrested? as a slave your master will whip you for no reason, and if you dare disobey or rebel then chances are you'll be dead on the spot. They were kidnapped troughout africa and forced into slavery, by whites. Whites had all the power, and the only thing you can do to have your life spared was work for them. But the truth is that long after the Civil War, white Americans continue to carry the same set of white supremacist beliefs that governed their thoughts and actions during slavery and into the post-emancipation era. They had took them by suprise kidnapped them and forced them to work how in the ever loving world are you meant to sand up to someone with a gun ( unless you have god speed dodging skills)
Explanation:
Name the things they could have done to stand up with everything i just listed above