The author Dante writes from a future point of view. He gives clues to what will happen to his character self. What happens to Dante the Character is prophecy while to Dante the Author it is history. You can say that the author version is wiser and more mature than the character version.
Answer:
The real Dante has uncompromising ideas about religion and human nature.
Explanation:
In an outline capital letters designate subtopics.
An outline begins with a thesis statement. The major points are listed with Roman numerals (I, II, III). The first subdivision of these major points are capital letters (A, B, C), followed by Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3), then lower-case letters (a, b, c). Therefore, the capital letters represent subtopics in an outline.
In an outline, capital letters usually indicate a main section.
An outline is made to guide the writer in the elaboration of a text. For this, the writer organizes the outline into sections that have several subtopics, related to the subject that will be addressed in the text.
Sections are represented in uppercase letters, while subtopics are represented in lowercase letters.
Learn more about outlines:
#SPJ6
b. a hypothesis.
c. a prediction.
d. a conclusion.
What are you doing, you guys? I shouldn’t have to _1_ you at this point in the game!” _2_ by Liza’s scream, the four workers picked up their sanders and returned to their unfinished portions of drywall.”
“We’re two days overdue! That means we’re paying them now!” The worker closest to Liza turned a _3_ of red as she screamed. He knew that Liza’s lecture was not merely _4_ to get the team to work faster; the contractors really were beyond their deadline. Liza was worried for good reason; if the company couldn’t prove that it was capable of _5_, short-notice refurbishing, it would more than likely lose its contract with the city.
Myron, the site foreman, appreciated Liza’s _6_ comments. At least she took the time to explain why the workers needed to labor more quickly. Such practice reminded the workers of just how small the degree of separation was between the company’s success and their paychecks. It also prevented the workers from classifying Liza as an _7_ manager who just wanted to make a profit. If the workers knew that the company was suffering, they knew that their jobs were in jeopardy
The subject of this question is English and the grade level is High School. The paragraph is about a situation at a company where the workers are behind schedule. The correct order of the given words in the paragraph is exhort, galvanized, hue, expedient, incisive, ominous, implacable. The words are used to complete the sentences and convey the meaning.
The subject of this question is English. The paragraph given is about a situation at a company where the workers are behind schedule. The words given in the question need to be correctly placed in the paragraph. Let's go through the options and fill in the blanks:
Filling in the blanks with the correct words, the completed paragraph looks like this:
What are you doing, you guys? I shouldn’t have to exhort you at this point in the game!” Galvanized by Liza’s scream, the four workers picked up their sanders and returned to their unfinished portions of drywall.”
“We’re two days overdue! That means we’re paying them now!” The worker closest to Liza turned a hue of red as she screamed. He knew that Liza’s lecture was not merely expedient to get the team to work faster; the contractors really were beyond their deadline. Liza was worried for good reason; if the company couldn’t prove that it was capable of incisive short-notice refurbishing, it would more than likely lose its contract with the city.
Myron, the site foreman, appreciated Liza’s ominous comments. At least she took the time to explain why the workers needed to labor more quickly. Such practice reminded the workers of just how small the degree of separation was between the company’s success and their paychecks. It also prevented the workers from classifying Liza as an implacable manager who just wanted to make a profit. If the workers knew that the company was suffering, they knew that their jobs were in jeopardy.
#SPJ2
I do hear the morning lark.
A. The sun is coming up and the fairies should leave.
B. Titania is about to fall in love with Bottom.
C. The enchantment on Bottom is about to end.
D. Theseus and Hippolyta are arriving
B. an audio recording of Winston Churchill
C. a timeline of events that involved Winston Churchill
D. a reliable Web site that includes facts and statistics about Winston Churchill
B. "Cf. Hammond [p514] v. South Carolina State College, 272 F.Supp. 947 (D.C.S.C.1967) (orderly protest meeting on state college campus); Dickey v. Alabama State Board of Education, 273 F.Supp. 613 (D.C.M.D. Ala. 967) (expulsion of student editor of college newspaper)."
C. "While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's statement that the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would."
D. "One does not need to be a prophet or the son of a prophet to know that, after the Court's holding today, some students in Iowa schools — and, indeed, in all schools — will be ready, able, and willing to defy their teachers on practically all orders.
Answer:
A. "In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views. As Judge Gewin, speaking for the Fifth Circuit, said, school officials cannot suppress 'expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend.'"
Explanation:
In this excerpt, the speaker tells us that a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate speech was not found. This shows the importance of precedent. The doctrine of precedent is the idea that judges must inform their decisions by studying past judicial decisions. In this case, the fact that there was no precedent that could justify the regulation of speech means that the judges could not conclude that the regulation of speech had a legitimate constitutional basis.