Read this excerpt from President John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address on January 20, 1961: In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility—I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.


My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.


Based on the excerpt, what is the central idea of this speech?
a)to cultivate a sense of well-being among the American people
b)to motivate people everywhere to uphold the freedom of humankind
c)to motivate Americans to strive for the development of their nation
d)to foster a feeling of happiness and unity across people and nations

Answer:

The sentence "The authors use of ___ affects the story by ___" is asking about how the author's choices in a story impact the overall narrative. To complete this sentence, we need to choose the correct word and phrase that demonstrate this relationship.

1. "The authors use of ___" refers to the specific techniques or elements employed by the author in their writing. This could include literary devices such as foreshadowing, symbolism, or irony, as well as choices in narration, character development, or setting.

2. "affects the story by ___" refers to the impact these choices have on the narrative. This could include creating tension, establishing a theme, shaping the plot, or developing the characters.

This question is apparently incomplete as it has no options available, anyway I will give you an explanation so you can understand the concept.

Answer:

When something is summarized or important information is given briefly you can say it has been  synthesized.

Explanation:

A summary is an abbreviated, concise and faithful exposition about the most important points of a text or document. As such, it can be done orally or in writing, and must be objective, clear and consistent.

The summary, in this sense, is a synthesis technique by means of which we take a text to its most essential expression, pointing out the most important ideas and the most relevant aspects of the subject, without the mediation of interpretations or critical positions. Its main objective is to make it easier for the reader to understand a text.

Answer:

I believe the best answer to be letter D. The event could find a bottled water company to sponsor the event.

Explanation:

Let's briefly analyze each option according to the type of event.

Letter A says there should be no water at all. - Every event should have water available for the participants, and in this case even more so because the participants are racing. They will need water to rehydrate.

Letter B claims water fountains should be installed along the race. - This presents multiple problems. Volunteers and money would be needed to proceed with the installation, which means more costs and more work to be done. Plus, it is not practical for the racers. As we know, racers do not stop to drink water during the race. They reach for bottles on the side of the route and drink from them while running.

Letter C states the event should contact a T-shirt company for more donations. - That could be done but, if a company agrees to donate instead of sponsor, we have a different purpose for the money. Donations to buy books are the purpose of the race. Using the money to buy water makes no practical sense.

Letter D is the best option. If a bottled water company agrees to sponsor the event, that means they will provide the event with the much-needed water. There will be no need for more volunteers to install water fountains, nor more money to spend on buying water. The problem is solved in a more direct - and much simpler - way.

Final answer:

The advantage for a historian in using primary sources over secondary sources is that they offer direct insight into how individuals experienced historical events. Primary sources provide a level of detail that secondary sources often cannot achieve.

Explanation:

The advantage that primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian is letter D: They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or original records created during the time being studied, such as diary entries, letters, official reports, photographs, and artifacts. This contrasts with secondary sources, which interpret, analyze or draw conclusions from primary sources.

By examining primary sources, historians gain direct insight into the perspectives and experiences of people from the past. This nuanced, first-hand information is a key advantage primary sources have, providing a level of detail that secondary sources often lack.

Learn more about Primary vs Secondary Sources here:

brainly.com/question/31563820

#SPJ2

Answer: careful

Explanation: