The correct answer is B. Saddam Hussein was quickly overthrown, but a civil war broke out that cost thousands of American and Iraqi lives.
Under the pretense that Saddam Hussein, the dictator of the nation, was creating WMDs, the United States attacked Iraq in 2003. But no such weapons were ever discovered. Instead, the invasion sparked a protracted civil war that killed thousands of Americans and Iraqis over the course of several years.
Although Saddam Hussein was swiftly removed from power, anarchy remained in the nation. After the Iraqi army was destroyed, numerous Sun-ni and Shi-ite militias began to engage in hostilities. Iraq was ruled by violence for many years after the United States failed to install a stable government there.
The American invasion of Iraq was a contentious event. Many individuals think that the invasion was founded on fabrications and that Iraq has suffered greatly as a result. Both financially and in terms of its reputation, the war has had a huge effect on the United States.
To know more about Saddam Hussein:
#SPJ2
I am sure it is b
hope it helps,☺
because africans were not knowing about the white because they seemed very new to them and accordind to my country its said that we africans we were told that whites could never die plus they had improved weapons.that is why we were forced and suffered hope you understand.
Answer: The house of Burgesses
Explanation:
In Jamestown, Virginia, the first elected legislative assembly in the New World the House of Burgesses convenes in the choir of the town's church.
The Gadsden Purchase (1853):
The Treaty of Mesilla, which went into force on June 8, 1854, gave the United States possession of a 29,670-square-mile (76,800 km2) portion of what is now southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico. This area is known as the Gadsden Purchase or Treaty of La Mesilla.
The United States sought to construct a transcontinental railroad along a deep southern route, which the Southern Pacific Railroad eventually completed in 1881–1883; the purchase comprised holdings south of the Gila River and west of the Rio Grande. The purchase was also intended to address other border problems.
Therefore, a deal between the United States and Mexico was finished in 1854, when the United States agreed to pay Mexico $10 million for a region of Mexico that was 29,670 square miles in size and ultimately became a part of Arizona and New Mexico.
Learn more about The Gadsden Purchase here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
completed the continental expansion of the United States.
paid Mexico $10 million.
acquired land for a southern railroad.
Explanation:
did it on EDGE
Answer:
radical republicans wanted to punish the south
Explanation:
Answer:
Abraham Lincoln's assassination dramatically changed the Reconstruction era. President Abraham Lincoln, America's Civil War leader, was assassinated just five days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his army at Appomattox Court House, ending the four-year War Between the States.
Explanation:
sorry if im wrong
1. Machiavelli's political treatise, The Prince, featured a new and different approach to political leadership at the time of its publication. Previous works on political leadership placed a strong stress on ethics and morality. For Machiavelli. ethics and morality, though present, do not and should not constrain the actions of a political leader: only the thought of the ultimate common good. If achieving the ultimate common implies telling lies, intimidating, bribing or even murdering others, morality should not get in the way. In this sense, Machiavelli was the first political author to propose a pragmatic view on politics deprived from any sentimentalism.
3. One way or another, whether they have read The Prince or not, most modern politicians would make proud disciples of Machiavelli because of the ease with which they lie, steal, coerce, etc. in order to advance their agendas.
4. I think there should be a sound balance between morality and political action. The political leader should understand that his/her goals should not be achieved setting their moral compass aside no matter how good it might for society as a whole.
5. Machiavelli's The Prince had a great effect and significance on political leadership and government for it changed the way that many kings, presidents and other kinds of rulers led their countries. Also, it raised certain opposition by other types of leaders who steered away from Machiavelli's teachings as they considered them immoral.