I don't care for an explanation PLEASE JUST HELP!!! It would mean a lot !!!! Thanks

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: What is it maybe i can help?

Related Questions

What negative numbers multiply to get a positive 54
Complete the function table and write the rule.
Expand or condense the following expression: 3log_2y+log_25-log_2 10
Consider the the first six terms in the sequence 10, 29, 48, 67, 86, 105. Which statements are correct? A) The 10th term in this sequence is 199. B) The 15th term in this sequence is 276. C) The 20th term in this sequence is 389. D) The recursive formula is an - 2ₙ₋₁ + 19. E) The explicit formula is a, = 19n - 9.
Solve the equation x/4+3=19 and verify the solution

Which of these is a simplified form of the equation 8y + 6 = 7 + 2y + 3y?3y = 1
8y = 6
13y = 13
5y = 13

Answers

8y+6=7+2y+3y

8y+6=7+5y

3y+6=7

3y=1

The time that a traffic light remains yellow is 1 second more than 0.05 times the speed limit. 1. Write an equation that represents Y, the length of the time the light is yellow at x miles per hour.

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use the variable Y to represent the length of time (in seconds) that the traffic light remains yellow at a speed of x miles per hour. According to the information given, the time the light is yellow (Y) is 1 second more than 0.05 times the speed limit (x). We can write this as:

Y = 0.05x + 1

In this equation:

Y represents the length of time the light is yellow in seconds.

x represents the speed limit in miles per hour.

The equation shows that the time the light is yellow increases linearly with the speed limit, with an additional 1-second buffer.

PLEASE HELP!!! needs to be answered in sentaces(01.07 HC)

Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain.

Line AB is parallel to EF, transversal GJ crosses line AB at K and crosses line EF at L.

Michael's Proof

Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle AKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property

Derrick's Proof

Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle BKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property

Answers

The proof that is completed incorrectly is Michael's proof of the statement "corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent."

Both proofs start with the same given information – lines AB and EF are parallel, and transversal segment GJ crosses line AB at point K and crosses line EF at point L. Both proofs also rely on the same theorems – the vertical angles theorem and the alternate interior angles theorem. However, the difference is in the way the two proofs make the jump from the first three statements to the fourth statement.

In Michael's proof, statement number 3 is incorrect. Statement 3 in Michael's proof states that "angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK" based on the alternate interior angles theorem. However, this statement is not true because the interior angle BKL is not formed by the intersection of two straight lines from a point on the line AB and a point on the line EF, which is required for the alternate interior angles theorem to apply.

In contrast, Derrick's proof uses the vertical angles theorem before applying the transitive property in statement 4. The statement "angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK" in Derrick's proof is a result of applying the transitive property to the statement that "angle AKG is congruent to angle BKL" in statement 3 and the statement that "angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK" in statement 2, which are both results of applying the vertical angles theorem. This is a valid proof.

Therefore, Michael's proof is incorrect because of an incorrect application of the alternate interior angles theorem, while Derrick's proof is correct because it uses the vertical angles theorem and applies the transitive property correctly.

C=-4 D=5 P=2 Q=-1

4cd×10×2p÷50d+20q=??

Answers

This is very simple; don't you worry.
Let's start by breaking down the problem so that it's not overwhelming.
For now, we're only going to focus on the very beginning of the problem -- 4c.
When a number is next to a letter with no signs in between (in terms of this kind of math), the number is called a coefficient and the letter is called a variable. When you see this in math, it means that the coefficient is being multiplied by the variable. But how do you know what the variable is?
In other examples of math, you'd have to solve for the variable, but in this case, they already give it to you! Look back at the top... what does C equal? It equals 4! This means that 4c is actually 4x4, or 4(4)!
What we just did there, changing 4c to 4 multiplied by 4, is called substitution. You just substituted the c with 4. Now you know that to solve this, you need to use the method of substitution. What do you get if you substitute all of the variables with the numbers they equal (as shown above)...?

((4*-4)*5)((10(2*2))/(50(5)))+20(-1). You didn't use parentheses to separate the term /50d + 20q, so I'm assuming that the first part of the problem is only divided by just 50d, and not 50d+20q. In the future, be sure to clarify with parentheses. Anyway...
((4*-4)*5)((10(2*2))/(50(5)))+20(-1). Do NOT let this scare you. All the parentheses do is help you see what is being multiplied. All that's left is simple order of operations! You should get -340 as your answer.

Please help im desperate if f(x) = 5 + 3x find the value of the dependent variable if the if he independent variable is -4 and if you know hoew to do this pls answer my other question