President Franklin Roosevelt's judicial Reform Bill would have allowed him to..?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: President Franklin Roosevelt's judicial Reform Bill would have allowed him to appoint as many as six additional Supreme Court justices. Roosevelt was angered because of the numerous anti New Deal decisions taken by the Supreme Court. This made him make new amendments and place six additional justices to pass his New Deal programs.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

appoint as many as 6 supreme court justices


Related Questions

When was World War I?
What foreign and domestic events does Jefferson refer to in his inauguration that he doesn’t call out by name?
When was miguel hidalgo executed?
According to________ , self-interest and competition act as_______ , guiding firms in a market-based economy.
What are the powers called that the framers of the constitution felt existed and were expected to be held by the national government due to historical precedence and common practice?

Doolittle bombing raid over tokyo raised hopes for an American victory in the Pacific

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "TRUE." Yes, Doolittle's bombing raid over Tokyo raised hopes for an American victory in the Pacific. The bombing raid occurred on April 18, 1942. This makes the statement that is presented, true.

What are some of the characteristics of globalization?

Answers

Globalization is the process of international integration arising from the interchange of world views, ideas, product and other culture, as defined in Wikipedia. The characteristics are free trade, liberalization, globalization of economic activities, connectivity, border-less globe, composite process, multi-dimensional process, top-down process, and global state vs. global civil society.

Which of these are reasons the colonists were angry with Britain? A) taxes, such as the Stamp Act
B) the Intolerable Acts, which punished Massachusetts
C) women not being allowed to vote
D) housing British soldiers in private homes

Answers

They were angry colonists  with Britain because of taxes, such as the Stamp Act, which punished Massachusetts and the housing of British soldiers in private homes. Options A, B, and D are correct.

Why the colonists were angry with the British?

Although each colony had its own government, the British king hold back relation over them. Many colonists were angry by the 1770s because they missed the self-government.

This tacit that they were incapable to rule themselves and found their own laws. The king demanded that they pay high taxes. They accepted that it was degraded to rise up against the Crown, that was the legitimate government.

They viewed a rebellion against Great Britain as a betrayal of the British Empire, and saw themselves as American citizens who were also loyal to the British Empire.

Therefore, option A, B, and D are correct.

Learn more about the Britain, refer to:

brainly.com/question/12517291

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is:

A. taxes, such as the Stamp Act

B. the Intolerable Acts, which punished Massachusetts

D. housing British soldiers in private homes

Explanation:

Which action would be considered an act of civil disobedience? rioting, which causes damage to private and government property engaging in a sit-in, in which African Americans stay at a segregated business looting, which results in the theft of property from private businesses boycotting, in which people choose not to purchase goods from businesses

Answers

The correct answer is Engaging in a sit in, in which African Americans stay at segregated businesses.

Civil disobedience refers to an action taken by individuals that does not involve the destruction of any property. With this in mind, you can see that statement 1 and 3 are wrong. Based on this definition you can also see that the last statement is wrong. Boycotting is not civil disobedience because a boycott involves a refusal to buy a product or participate in a certain action. This leaves only the second statement as the correct answer.

Answer:

B. engaging in a sit-in, in which African Americans stay at a segregated business

Explanation:

edge 2021

While Maria is shopping, she notices a teenage girl slip a tube of lipstick in her purse and walk away. Maria thinks about it for a moment and decides that as a witness to a crime, she has an obligation to do something. What part of Professor Robert Sternberg's ethical reasoning model is Maria in at this stage?

Answers

Answer:

She is in step number 6 of Stenberg's ethical reasoning model.

Explanation:

Robert Stenberg, Professor of Human Development at Cornell, developed a the ethical reasoning model in eight different steps. In number six, the person must decide how the ethical rules actually could be applied to a specific problem, and it usually comes with a solution. The problem is the girl taking the lipstick, and the solution is Mary's decision to act about it.

As a result of the Immigration Act of 1965

Answers

Asians and Latin Americans became the largest contingent of new Americans, because were discriminatory quotas based on nationality.

President Johnson signed the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965 in a ceremony held on Liberty Island in New York harbor. This new act abolished the discriminatory quotas based upon national origin that had governed immigration policy since the 20s. The new law treated all nationalities and races equally. In place of national quotas, it created hemispheric ceilings on visas issued: 170,000 for persons from outside the Western Hemisphere,120,000 for persons from within. It also stipulated that no more than 20,000 people could come from any one country each year. The new act allowed the entry of immediate family members of American residents without limit. During the 60s, Asians and Latin Americans became the largest contingent of new Americans.

The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, abolished an earlier quota system based on national origin and established a new immigration policy based on reuniting immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States.